MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Prebent & Miniplates in Fixation of Lefort I Osteotomty in Maxillary Advancement.

NCT03752944 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12

Last updated 2018-11-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

In patients with retruded maxilla ,Will the use of two prebent plates produce more stable results postoperatively in fixation of Le Fort I osteotomy in maxillary advancement than conventional four minplates ? Many studies have been conducted to compare between the two plates and these studies showed that the prebent plate, the plate is not excessively twisted so that it can be adapted passively leading to less changes in the property of the material ,increased titanium contact surface to the bone leading to better force distribution resulting in better rigid fixation as no stresses will be transmitted from the plate to the bone leading to faster bone healing and consequently better long term postoperative stability.

Conditions

  • Retruded Hypoplastic Maxilla

Interventions

PROCEDURE

lefort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement

fixation of lefort I osteotomy in patients with retruded maxilla with two prebent plates versus four miniplates.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hagar A Mohamed, BDS · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-12-31
Primary Completion
2019-12-31
Completion
2019-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03752944 on ClinicalTrials.gov