MedTrace Logo

Effects of Conventional Versus Skeletally Anchored Facemask in Treatment of the Prepubertal Skeletal Class III Patients

NCT05089396 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 14

Last updated 2021-11-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study will be directed to the assessment of dentoskeletal effects concomitant with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction in orthodontic skeletal Class III patients.

Conditions

  • Maxillary Deficiency
  • Maxillary Retrusion

Interventions

OTHER

Maxillary protraction

A petit facemask will be used for maxillary protraction along with a facemask splint (two acrylic bite blocks connected through a transpalatal arch) in the active comparator group. in the experimental group, two miniscrews will be inserted in the anterior region of the palate one on each side of the midline to provide skeletal anchorage for the facemask splint. in both groups, a force of 380 gm to 400 gm will be applied through the extra-oral elastics the will be attached to the facemask on one side and to the facemask splint on the other side.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Al-Azhar University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
8 Years
Max Age
14 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-11-22
Primary Completion
2022-07-31
Completion
2022-10-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05089396 on ClinicalTrials.gov