Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression and Laminectomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT02006901 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 721
Last updated 2015-04-08
Summary
Introduction: This observational study is designed to test the equivalence between the clinical effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy in the surgical treatment of central lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most frequent indication for spinal surgery in the elderly, and as the oldest segment of the population continues to grow its prevalence is likely to increase. However, data on surgical outcomes are limited. Open or wide decompressive laminectomy, often combined with medial facetectomy and foraminotomy, was formerly the standard treatment. In recent years a growing tendency towards less invasive decompressive procedures has emerged. Many spine surgeons today perform microdecompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis.
Prospectively registered treatment and outcome data are obtained from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine).
Conditions
- Spinal Stenosis
- Spinal Cord Compression
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
microdecompression
a minimal invasive surgical technique
- PROCEDURE
-
laminectomy
The traditional open surgical technique: decompression with removal of the spinous process, lamina and often the medial facets
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
collaborator OTHER -
St. Olavs Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sasha Gulati, MD, PhD · St. Olavs Hospital
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-01-31
- Completion
- 2015-01-31
Countries
- Norway
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Instr. vs. Non-instr. Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Patients With Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Listhesis
NCT04166981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Activity Levels Amongst Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06057428 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Is it Really Necessary Going All Over the Top in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
NCT07026305 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microdecompression Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterior Stabilization for Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
NCT04087694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The NORDSTEN Studies/The Observational Cohort Study
NCT03562936 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Full-Endoscopic vs Open Discectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Herniated Disc
NCT02441959 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis; Micro-decompression vs Decompression + Instrumented Fusion; Long Term Follow up
NCT03469791 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Invasive Surgery Versus Interlaminar Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT05147064 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Instability in the Lumbar Spine of Patients With Age Related Changes and Narrowing of the Spinal Canal (Spinal Stenosis)
NCT04406987 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The NORDSTEN Study - Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
NCT02051374 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between The Results of Open and Microsurgical Decompression in Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis in Lumbar Spine
NCT06722859 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Decompression and Fusion Versus Open for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
NCT04594980 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictors of Decompressive Laminectomy Outcomes
NCT02215551 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04778943 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Level of Activity in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Patients Pre- and Post-surgery
NCT02154191 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Lumbar Discectomy by Endoscopy and Conventional Microscopic Discectomy
NCT06193265 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Balance Amongst Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT06075862 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Evaluation of the Contribution of Intraoperative Scans Coupled With the Navigation for the Precision of the Positioning of the Pedicle Screws During a Lumbar Spine Surgery: a Prospective Randomised Study
NCT04134975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Open Discectomy Versus Microscopic Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT04112485 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectiveness of Small Size Interarcuair Decompression Versus Extended Decompression in Patients With Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication
NCT03480893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Decompressive Laminectomy Versus Laminectomy With Transpedicular Fixation in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT07281625 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Endoscopic Decompression Versus Microscopic Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT06381167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of X-STOP® Versus Laminectomy Study
NCT00558129 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Decompression Versus Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease. Clinical and Biomechanical Outcome Study
NCT06335511 ·Status: COMPLETED