Child and Parental Satisfaction of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06897020 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2025-03-28
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the child and parents satisfaction of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer : Is there a difference in the child and parents satisfaction levels between BioFlx crowns and zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars?" The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of Retention, occlusal wear, gingival health, as well as preparation time.
Conditions
- Carious Primary Molars
Interventions
- OTHER
-
(Group A: Bioflx crowns)
prepartion:1.The mesiodistal width of the tooth will be measured using calipers and a closely fitted crown will be selected based on the measurements. 2.The tooth will be prepared similarly to stainless steel crowns (SSCs): • Occlusal reduction of approximately 1-1.5 mm will be done using a diamond bur.Mesial and distal reduction of no more than 1 mm will be performed using a No. 169L diamond bur.Depending on the tooth anatomy, either no buccal and lingual reduction will be needed, or a minimal reduction will be done. 3.All sharp line angles and corners will be smoothed to ensure proper crown fit. 4.The crown will be checked for proper fit before cementation. It will be positioned to extend 1 mm below the gingival margin. 5.The crown will be cemented using luting glass ionomer cement (GIC). The crown will be held with firm, constant pressure until the cement sets initially. 6.The marginal fit will be evaluated, and necessary adjustments will be made. 7.The occlusion will be checked.
- OTHER
-
(Group B: Preformed Zirconia crown
1. Crown Selection: The mesiodistal dimension of the corresponding tooth will be measured . to select the appropriate size. 2. Occlusal Reduction: The marginal ridge of adjacent teeth will be used as a reference point and a 1.5-2 mm of occlusal reduction will be performed to allow proper crown seating. 3. Bucco-Lingual Reduction: The bucco-lingual wall will be reduced by approximately 1-1.5 mm using a flame-shaped diamond bur. 4. Interproximal Reduction: 1mm of interproximal reduction will be performed using a flame-shaped diamond bur such as a .368 or .330tapered carbide bur. 5. Feather Margin Preparation: Subgingival reduction of 1-2 mm will be done using a flame-shaped diamond bur, creating a feathered margin to achieve a passive fit. 6. Trial Fitting of the Crown: The crown will be tried in to ensure proper adaptation. until the crown fits passively and extends sub gingivally by 1-2 mm wit. 7. Glass ionomer cement will be used for cementation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Prof.Dr. Manal Ahmed Elshiekh, Ph.D · Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 4 Years
- Max Age
- 8 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-30
- Completion
- 2026-02-26
Countries
- Egypt
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns vs Stainless Steel Crowns
NCT06396195 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioflex Crowns Endocrowns Compared to Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns on Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT06433141 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison Between Stainless-steel Crown, Zirconia Crown and Bioflx Crown in Primary Molars
NCT06706167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial of Two Types of Aesthetics Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06973616 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Acceptance of Bioflx Crowns
NCT06677983 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars.
NCT04620174 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Polymethyl Methacrylate CAD/CAM Crowns Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06113770 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Custom-Made Zirconia Crowns and 3D-Printed Resin Crowns Versus Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06581510 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Relation Between Oral Hygiene and Microbial Load in the Oral Cavity After Restoring Primary Molars With Two Types of Ready-made Crowns
NCT06767670 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical and Radiographic Success of Nusmile Bioflex Versus Stainless-Steel Crowns in Restoring Decayed Primary Molars with Modified Hall Technique
NCT06721741 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D-printed Crowns Versus Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06068244 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Analysis of Primary Teeth Crown Dimensions and Clinical Evaluation in a Sample of Egyptian Children
NCT06874218 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Convenience of Four Types of Crowns for Primary Molars
NCT06456879 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Occlusal Caries Using Silver Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
NCT04354636 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Two Preventive Measures on Caries Progression in Mixed Dentition Patients.
NCT06119126 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Outcomes of Digital vs Prefab Crowns for Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT06733909 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Zirconia Crowns and Endocrowns in Pulpotomized Primary Molars
NCT04073901 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Prefabricated CAD/CAM PEEK Crowns Used in Primary Molars
NCT06583759 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Two Different Types of Zirconia Crowns Used in Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT05121584 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA