Clinical Evaluation and Patient Satisfaction of Shade Matching Between Natural Teeth and Monolithic All-ceramic Crowns Fabricated From Two Materials
NCT03779607 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 10
Last updated 2019-01-18
Summary
evaluation of color difference between zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (celtra press) VS lithium disilicate (Emax) in relation to natural tooth structure to determine which monolithic material will provide restoration with exact shade and optical properties as natural tooth structure.
Conditions
- Natural Optical Properties
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Celtra Press
new class of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate material available to labs for pressing. This unique material provides top aesthetics and is virtually impossible to tell apart from a natural tooth. Celtra Press is a multiphase ceramic consisting of a glass matrix and lithium disilicate crystals having a crystal length of about 1.5 µm plus nano-scale lithium phosphate . In addition to Li2O and SiO2, Celtra Press contains about 10% zirconia (ZrO2), which is dissolved completely in the glass phase rather than in crystalline form. Celtra Press is characterized by a high strength of about 500 MPa and excellent flow properties during pressing.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohamed zamzam, professor · Fixed Prosthodontics Faculty of Oral and dental medicine Cairo University
-
Maha Taymour, Associate professor · Fixed Prosthodontics Faculty of Oral and dental medicine Cairo University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2019-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2019-11-30
- Completion
- 2019-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Wear of Enamel Antagonist to ZLS Crowns
NCT04914962 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Antagonist Wear Behavior and Patient Satisfaction of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass When Compared to Monolithic Zirconia
NCT03697018 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Anterior Teeth Restored With Ultra-translucent Multilayer Zirconia vs Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneers
NCT04598737 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluate the Shade Matching of Polychromatic Versus Monochromatic Composite Layering Techniques in Fractured Class IV Maxillary Central Incisors Using Universal , Layering & One Shade Composite In-vivo on Patients
NCT06743984 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Copmere Between Bleaching and Laminate Veneers
NCT03621163 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Pressed BioHPP Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns
NCT03697005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Translucent Zirconia Crowns in Dental Esthetic Zone With Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique (BOPT) Versus Conventional Preparation (Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT04320758 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Color Match Assessment of a Single Shade Structurally Colored Universal Resin Composite
NCT04960852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of IPS Empress CAD Versus Polished Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers
NCT03136276 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Color Stability and Patient Satisfaction for Polished Versus Glazed Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramic Restorations and Patient Satisfaction
NCT03696641 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Marginal Evaluation of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Disilicate Partial Coverage Restoration of Egyptian Posterior Teeth.
NCT05281861 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Monolithic CAD/CAM Single Tooth Ceramic Crowns
NCT04474093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact Of Digital Photography & Conventional Method On The Accuracy Of Dental Shade Matching In The Esthetic Zone
NCT03229707 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Full Veneered Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Crowns Cemented With Self-Adhesive Resin Cement Using Two Curing Modes
NCT07043998 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Prepared With Two Occlusal Designs and Two Ceramic Full Coverage Restorations
NCT06695091 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06890949 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Color Stability of Sectional and Full Glass Ceramic Laminate Veneer
NCT06470945 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Using Shade Blocker Versus Chameleon Effect of Two Single Shade of Resin Composite in Class IV Restorations
NCT05315518 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shade Matching Potential of Universal Shade Resin Composite Materials Compared to Multi Shade Resin Composite in Restoration of Carious Cervical Lesions in Anterior Teeth
NCT05465850 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Wear of Enamel Antagonist to Two Different Types of Monolithic Zirconia Monolithic Zirconia
NCT04798300 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Milled BioHPP (PEEK) Versus Zirconia Veneered Single Crowns (RCT-one-year Evaluation).
NCT03701178 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Shade Matching of Universal Versus Conventional Nanohybrid Resin Composites in Class IV Restorations After Bleaching
NCT05638373 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Photography and Numeric Shade Quantification as a Substitute to Conventional and Instrumental Shade Matching Techniques in the Esthetic Zone
NCT04817579 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Laminate Veneers With Coronal Post Versus Post and Core Foundation Restoration With Single Crown for Restoration of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth (Randomized Controlled Trial) "In-vivo Study"
NCT03314545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA