Comparison Between Desarda and Lichtenstein's Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair Under Local Anaesthesia
NCT03512366 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 55
Last updated 2020-10-19
Summary
Inguinal hernia repair is done by two methods. The conventional method uses a prosthetic mesh for strengthening the defect but has been associated with complications. Another new method uses a strip of the external oblique aponeurosis to do the same.There is a necessity to conduct studies comparing the two methods of hernia repair under local anaesthesia in terms of feasibility, economic benefits, faster ambulation with less complications. The purpose of the study is to find a method that will lead to faster disposal of patients and early return to activities, thereby reducing the waiting list of patients that compromises their financial and social spheres and overwhelms the welfare system.
Conditions
- Hernias Inguinal Reducible
- Local Anaesthesia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Desarda's technique
It will be performed by separating a strip from the upper leaf of the external oblique aponeurosis in continuity with the muscle and suturing it with the inguinal ligament below and the newly formed upper leaf of EOA above behind the spermatic cord to form the new inguinal floor. This strip will be put under tension by muscular contraction and works as a shield to prevent recurrence.
- PROCEDURE
-
Lichtenstein's technique
A 6 × 11 cm polypropylene mesh will be fashioned to fit the posterior wall of the inguinal canal and sutured to the fibro-periosteum of the pubic bone and continued laterally, suturing the inferior edge of the mesh to the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament to a point 2 cm lateral to the internal ring.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dr. Prakash Ku Sasmal, MBBS,MS,FNB · Associate Professor, Dept. of General Surgery
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-12-09
- Primary Completion
- 2020-10-31
- Completion
- 2020-11-30
Countries
- India
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparing Darn and Lichtenstein Repair for Bilateral Inguinal Hernias in Adult Males in a Low-Resource Setting
NCT06681454 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Modified Guarnieri-Desarda Technique Versus Lichtenstein Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06595628 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh Implantation for the Prevention of Incisional Hernia
NCT01203553 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic TEP vs. Lichtenstein Hernioplasty in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03566433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self Fixating Mesh to Mesh Fixation With Metallic Tacks in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03564535 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR AND LICHTENSTEIN HERNIA REPAIR
NCT03935503 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
NCT01637818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prophylactic Mesh in Cytoreductive Surgery
NCT03953365 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Onlay Versus Sublay Mesh in Incisional Hernia
NCT06197854 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Open and Endoscopic Technique in Female Inguinal Hernia Repair. FemaleHernia
NCT05863624 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Inguinodynia After Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03678272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Mesh Versus Mesh Method for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT00941941 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-inguinal Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty Versus Lichtnestein's Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03438786 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: Desarda Versus Darn
NCT06712212 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Post-Surgical Outcomes of Conventional vs 3-Point Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Repair: An RCT
NCT07334548 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Surgisis
NCT00614419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Desarda Technique in Management of Complicated Inguinal Hernia
NCT06884826 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Treatment - Lichtenstein Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty
NCT00642200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01638221 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Whole Mesh and Split Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT05420376 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Robot-assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Single Institution Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT03133533 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Non-fixation of Mesh to Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01117337 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients
NCT06417346 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
When and Why Desarda Repair
NCT05088824 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Three Meshes in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
NCT01295437 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA