MedTrace Logo

Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair

NCT06650878 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 478

Last updated 2025-06-24

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to evaluate whether a surgical technique (Desarda) is superior to the commonly used surgical technique (Lichtenstein) in inguinal hernia repair concerning the occurrence of postoperative complications. The Lichtenstein technique involves the use of a mesh, while the Desarda technique does not.

Conditions

  • Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
  • Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Desarda

This technique prevent from using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia

PROCEDURE

Lichtenstein

This technique implies using a mesh to surgical repair of a inguinal hernia

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i Garraf

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Javier Errando, MD · CSAPG

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-03-26
Primary Completion
2027-12-01
Completion
2030-12-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06650878 on ClinicalTrials.gov