Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Surgisis
NCT00614419 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70
Last updated 2021-03-18
Summary
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Lichtenstein's hernioplasty using the Surgisis ES soft tissue graft, as a mesh, and to compare it with the traditional Lichtenstein procedure performed with polypropylene mesh.
Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Prolene Polypropylene Mesh
The Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty consists of a swatch of polypropylene mesh, partway slit 1 cm from its inferior edge to accommodate the spermatic cord. The mesh is sutured circumferentially to the internal oblique abdominal muscle, the rectus sheath and the shelving edge of the inguinal ligament. The tails of the mesh are drawn around the cord and the inferior edge of each tail is sutured to the inguinal ligament. In case of direct hernias, no effort is made to repair the hernia itself. In indirect hernias the sac is excised, except for sliding hernias. The polypropylene mesh group: in this group of patients the polypropylene mesh will be fixed by the above mentioned sutures in Prolene 3/0.
- DEVICE
-
Surgisis Inguinal Hernia Matrix
The Surgisis mesh group: in this group of patients a 7x20cm Surgisis ES Soft Tissue Graft sheet will be used. In sterile manner the sheet will be removed from the peel-open package. The Surgisis sheet will be cut and fashioned as appropriate. Then the pre-shaped sheet will will be placed for at least 10 minutes into a sterile dish with sterile room-temperature normo-saline to be rehydrated. Using aseptic techique, the rehydrated Surgisis sheet will be transferred to the already prepared and dissected inguinal region and will be fixed with PDS II 2/0.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Luca Ansaloni, MD · St.Orsola-malpighi Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2003-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2003-12-31
- Completion
- 2003-12-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Absorbable Sutures , Non Absorbable Sutures or Biologic Fibrin Glue for Protesic Mesh Fixing in Lichtenstein Technique for Primitive Groin Hernia Repair: a Randomized Prospective Multicentric Trial
NCT02011698 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT01592942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
NCT01637818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Desarda Tissue Technique vs Lichtenstein Technique for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06650878 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Parietex Progrip Study
NCT00827944 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of ProFlor vs. Lichtenstein for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02240550 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Immunologic Reaction to Polypropylene Mesh in Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT01090284 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
ProGrip Mesh Repair vs Lichtenstein Operation
NCT02748629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Desarda and Lichtenstein Techniques in Inguinal Hernia Treatment.
NCT01237470 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Three Meshes in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
NCT01295437 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Multi-site Trial Comparing Lichtensteins Operation and Prolene Hernia System in Inguinal HErnia Repair
NCT00184483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Elliptical Domed Mesh Technique and Lichtenstein Technique in Inguinal Hernia
NCT01348477 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Histoacryl™ vs. Suture for Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty: A Randomized Prospective Double-Blinded Study
NCT02632097 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy Study of Tissucol/Tisseel Fibrin Sealant to Treat Inguinal Hernia
NCT00306839 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Three Different Techniques for Open Hernia Repair
NCT01699971 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PHS, Lichtenstein Mesh, and PerFixPlug for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair - 3 Years Results
NCT00580177 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RCT Comparing Lightweight vs. Heavyweight Meshes in Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT04961346 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lichtenstein Versus TAPP and TEP in Groin Hernioplasty
NCT02928146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh
NCT02062775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Observational Study on the Use of a Self Fixating Lightweight Polyester Mesh in Open Inguinal Hernia
NCT01421602 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Treatment - Lichtenstein Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty
NCT00642200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Inguinodynia After Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03678272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study on the Post-operative Pain and Other Outcomes of Mesh Fixation With Prolene vs Vicryl vs Skin Staples in Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair.
NCT07210424 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Functional Outcome After Groin Hernia Mesh Repair: Open Versus Laparoscopy
NCT00625534 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIA REPAIR AND LICHTENSTEIN HERNIA REPAIR
NCT03935503 ·Status: COMPLETED