The Desarda and Lichtenstein Techniques in Inguinal Hernia Treatment.
NCT01237470 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 2009
Last updated 2010-11-09
Summary
Contemporary treatment of inguinal hernia is generally based on surgical methods with the use of synthetic meshes. The implanted meshes however have some disadvantages: they increase the risk of infection, tend to sustain inflammation process, can generate chronic pain and fertility disorders, can move from the initial implantation site, increase costs of treatment etc. The research to find any new hernioplasty without the use of meshes is still going on.
Desarda in 2002 year published his own results over hernia treatment with the use of external oblique aponeurosis. These results were comparable with the effects of Lichtenstein technique.
The initial assessment done in our own department revealed good clinical results after hernia treatment with Desarda's method.
To make appropriate and objective clinical assessment of the Desarda's technique for primary inguinal hernia treatment the randomized multicentre double blinded clinical trial (RCT) was projected and conducted. Finally, 105 patients were included in the Desarda group and 103 in the Lichtenstein group. Personal clinical follow up was made up to 3 years after operation.
Generally no statistically significant differences were found between these groups. The only difference was higher rate of seroma after Lichtenstein technique and different pain perception in both groups. To the summary it is clear that Desarda technique is quite attractive and good proposition for operative hernia treatment without mesh. The RCT was done with the use of SharePoint Portal Server (Microsoft) which seems to be appropriate for clinical trials.
Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Desarda technique
no mesh technique with undetached strip of external oblique aponeurosis placed at the floor of inguinal canal
- PROCEDURE
-
Lichtenstein technique
hernioplasty with the usage of plain polypropylene mesh
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Nicolaus Copernicus University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Stanislaw Dabrowiecki, MD, PhD · Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University Bydgoszcz, Poland
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2005-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2009-06-30
- Completion
- 2009-06-30
Countries
- Poland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Surgisis
NCT00614419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Polypropylene Mesh Versus Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01141335 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Minimally Invasive Open Preperitoneal Surgery With Polysoft Mesh Versus a Classic Open Surgery With Light Weight Mesh
NCT00323674 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Desarda Repair Compared to Lichtenstein Repair for the Treatment of Inguinal Hernias
NCT04850131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
NCT01637818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Meshes in Hernia Repair
NCT01090219 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Mesh Versus Mesh Method for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT00941941 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Treatment - Lichtenstein Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty
NCT00642200 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Darn and Lichtenstein Repair for Bilateral Inguinal Hernias in Adult Males in a Low-Resource Setting
NCT06681454 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Elliptical Domed Mesh Technique and Lichtenstein Technique in Inguinal Hernia
NCT01348477 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Lichtenstein Versus TAPP and TEP in Groin Hernioplasty
NCT02928146 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Position and Outcomes Following Inguinal Hernia Repair Using an MRI Visible Hernia Mesh
NCT02770703 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Trans-inguinal Pre-peritoneal Hernioplasty Versus Lichtnestein's Technique in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03438786 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Inguinodynia After Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03678272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Lightweight Meshes in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair on Quality of Life and Male Fertility Aspects
NCT00925067 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Immunologic Reaction to Polypropylene Mesh in Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT01090284 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Inguinal Hernia Repair and Male Fertility
NCT05799742 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Functional Outcome After Groin Hernia Mesh Repair: Open Versus Laparoscopy
NCT00625534 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic TEP vs. Lichtenstein Hernioplasty in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03566433 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernias
NCT01264003 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Desarda Technique in Management of Complicated Inguinal Hernia
NCT06884826 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Macroporous Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT02023203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Changing the Innate Consensus About Mesh Fixation in Trans-abdominal Preperitoneal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty in Adults: Short and Long Term Outcome. Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT04272424 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Inguinal Hernia Study Using Biodesign IHM
NCT00393887 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lichtenstein Patch or Prolene Hernia System (PHS) for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01070693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA