Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair in Elderly Patients

NCT06417346 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160

Last updated 2024-05-16

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Inguinal hernia is one of the most frequently performed surgeries in general surgery. This surgery can be performed with both open and laparoscopic techniques. There is no clear consensus on whether inguinal hernia repair, which is one of the most frequently performed surgeries in elderly patients, should be performed open or laparoscopic. The application of the open technique with regional anesthesia methods such as spinal anesthesia and local anesthesia makes these methods attractive. The fact that laparoscopic techniques cause patients to recover faster also makes these techniques attractive. However, the fact that it is usually performed under general anesthesia is a significant disadvantage. Increasing comorbidities and increased drug use, especially in elderly patients, make surgeons think about which technique to prefer. The aim of this study is to compare open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, which should be preferred in patients over 65 years of age.

Conditions

  • Urinary Retention
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Pain
  • Relapse

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic TEP Repair

Laparoscopic TEP Repair performed

PROCEDURE

Open Technique (Lichtenstein)

Open Technique (Lichtenstein) performed

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Van Training and Research Hospital

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-10-04
Primary Completion
2024-06-04
Completion
2024-12-30

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06417346 on ClinicalTrials.gov