Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Versus Clonidine to Control Delirium in Patients Undergoing CABG

NCT03477994 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 147

Last updated 2019-07-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This prospective, randomised, double blinded, controlled clinical trial will be conducted in 147 patients between 60 yr and 70 yr , ASA physical status II and III, undergoing CABG. Patients will be randomly allocated to either dexmedetomidine or clonidine (control) groups .Upon arrival to ICU, in the dexmedetomidine group, patients will receive an infusion of 0.5-0.7 μg/kg/h then 1.4 μg/kg/h if Richmond assessment sedation score from +1 to +4

Taking into consideration if the heart rate less than 60 per minute or persistent hypotension reduce infusion rate by 0.2 μg/kg/h.

Once the patient will be extubated, wean the infusion by 0.1μg/kg/h till reaching 0.2μg/kg/h. Slow the weaning rate if evidence of withdrawal reactions as agitation or hypertension occur. In clonidine group, the patients will receive 0.5μg/kg then 0.1-0.2 μg/kg/h.Primary end point of the study is the incidence of delirium.The secondary endpoints will be the the duration of extubation, the length of ICU stay, need for inotropic support or vasopressors, hospital stay , mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate , hospital mortality rate , all additional sedatives including overall doses of morphine and haloperidol the incidence of adverse events as bradycardia

Conditions

  • Delirium on Emergence

Interventions

DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

an infusion of 0.5-0.7 μg/kg/h then 1.4 μg/kg/h if Richmond assessment sedation score from +1 to +4 ,if the heart rate less than 60 per minute or persistent hypotension reduce infusion rate by 0.2 μg/kg/h.

DRUG

Clonidine

an infusion of 0.5μg/kg then 0.1-0.2 μg/kg/h if Richmond assessment sedation score from +1 to +4.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Ayman Shoeb, professor · Ain Shams University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
60 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-12-01
Primary Completion
2019-02-28
Completion
2019-02-28

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03477994 on ClinicalTrials.gov