MedTrace Logo

A Retrospective Review of Enseal Laparoscopic Vaginal Assisted Hysterectomy (LAVH) Versus Traditional LAVH

NCT01217866 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 79

Last updated 2012-12-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Retrospective charts review from one surgeon to compare Group A- cases where the laparoscopic portion of the case used an EN\~SEAL device to Group B - the laparoscopic BSO was done using a 3mm EN-SEAL device through 2 lateral 5mm ports.

Conditions

  • Benign Uterine Disease

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy

Surgical removal of uterus vaginally

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ethicon Endo-Surgery

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Womens Care

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Katie O'Keeffe, MD · Glens Falls Hospital

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-08-31
Primary Completion
2011-02-28
Completion
2011-02-28

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01217866 on ClinicalTrials.gov