Rotation of an Intraocular Lens - HOYA Vivinex iSert P261
NCT03157375 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 66
Last updated 2017-05-17
Summary
Age-related cataract is the main cause of impaired vision in the elderly population worldwide. In the UK, more than half of people who are over 65 years old have some cataract development in one or both eyes. The only treatment that can restore functional visual ability is cataract surgery where the opacified crystalline lens is removed by phacoemulsification and an artificial intraocular lens is implanted. It is estimated that around 10 million cataract operations are performed around the world each year. Cataract operations are generally very successful, with a low risk of serious complications.
During the past two decades, cataract surgery underwent tremendous change and modernisation resulting in today's small incision phacoemulsification surgery and a safe technique with a short rehabilitation time for the patient. Traditional spherical monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) restore best-corrected vision and may lessen the need for spectacles. These IOLs correct only the spherical portion of the total refractive error and do not correct corneal astigmatism. Astigmatism is a visually disabling refractive error affecting the general population, especially those with cataract. At least 15% to 20% of cataract patients have 1.5 diopters (D) or more of corneal or refractive astigmatism. With increased patient expectations, the trend is not only to remove the cataract but also to address the problem of pre-existing astigmatism at the time of surgery.
Surgical-induced astigmatism can be reduced by smaller incisions, i.e. microincision cataract surgery (MICS), which by definition is surgery performed through incisions smaller than 2.0 mm, reducing the need for suturing. This results in better corneal optical quality, thus improving visual outcomes. There are also other surgical options to correct preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery like: selectively positioning of the phacoemulsification incision; astigmatic keratotomy with corneal or limbal relaxing incisions; excimer laser refractive procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy, laser in situ keratomileusis, and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy; or implanting pseudophakic toric posterior chamber intraocular lenses (IOLs).
Toric IOLs have been shown to result in good visual and refractive outcomes. Combined with MICS, these IOLs can allow effective correction of cylindrical errors intraoperatively, improving visual quality and thus leading to spectacle independence. Plate haptic and loop haptic toric IOLs have been considered for about a decade but have been associated with postoperative rotational instability. Rotation of a toric lens from its intended orientation degrades its corrective power, with approximately 3.3% loss of cylindrical power for every degree off axis. A misorientation of approximately 30° negates the effectiveness of astigmatic correction, and a misorientation of more than 30° may induce additional astigmatism. Although some patients are asymptomatic despite induced astigmatism, others experience symptoms such as blurred or distorted vision, headache, fatigue, eyestrain, squinting, or eye discomfort. Thus, IOL orientation stability is an essential goal in toric IOL design.
RATIONALE
The purpose of this study is to assess the axial IOL rotation and optical quality (refraction, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, decentration and tilt) and capsular bag reaction after micro-incision surgery with an IOL implantation in cataract patients - HOYA Vivinex iSert® model P261.
Conditions
- Intraocular Lens
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Intraocular Lens Implantation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical University of Vienna
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-10-06
- Primary Completion
- 2015-10-02
- Completion
- 2015-10-02
Countries
- Austria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Toric IOL Implantation and Opposite Clear Corneal Incision During Cataract Surgery to Correct Corneal Astigmatism
NCT01763151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Posterior Capsule Opafication of Two Different Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses
NCT04196673 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Study Investigating the Impact of Different IOL Designs on Subjective 2D and 3D Image Quality
NCT02409641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Study Simulating Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Healthy Subjects
NCT01873781 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Rotation Stability of Toric Intraocularlens (IOL) Compared Sitting Against Lying After Cataract Operation
NCT04776057 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Capsule Opacification and Optical Quality of Different Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses
NCT03831074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraindividual Comparison of EMO IOLs
NCT05822089 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Rotation of Hydrophobic Acrylic Lenses - Rayner RA0800C & Alcon Clareon & Hoya Nanex & Hoya Vivinex XY1-EM & RayOne EMV Toric & PODEYE Toric
NCT03803852 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Capsule Opacification and Frequency of Nd:YAG Treatment and of Two Microincision IOLs: Hoya iMics NY-60 vs Acrysof SN60WF
NCT01732484 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Observation of Rotation of an Intraocular Lens
NCT02208232 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Visual Performance With a Hydrophobic Aspheric Monofocal IOL
NCT03819582 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Reading Performance in Patients With Acrysof IQ Vivity Versus Acrysof IQ
NCT05194657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Two Intraocular Lenses With Extended Depth of Vision
NCT05194150 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of a Novel Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens on Visual and Lifestyle Enhancement
NCT04570579 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Rotational Stability of the TECNIS Eyhance Toric
NCT05126368 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cell Ongrowth and Biocompatibility Study of Two Different (Hydrophobic Acrylic) Intraocular Lenses: IOL XY1 vs. IOL XY1A
NCT06708806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Analysis of Peripheral Vision With Two Different IOLs
NCT05639075 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Performance of an Extended Depth of Focus IOL in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality
NCT06624826 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of the Tecnis Symfony Intraocular Lens (IOL)
NCT03579368 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Physiological Responses at the Anterior Surface of Two (Hydrophobic Acrylic) Intraocular Lens Models
NCT04230629 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Performance, Patient Satisfaction and PCO Rate After Implantation of a Trifocal Hydrophobic IOL
NCT03306342 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Different IOLs in Patients With and Without Uveitis
NCT02975895 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Confirm Safety and Performance of a New Multifocal IOL
NCT06247683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Premium Trifocal IOL Comparative Analysis
NCT04875455 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Investigation of the ClarVista HARMONI™ Modular Intraocular Lens Implant Following Cataract Surgery
NCT02521766 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA