Posterior Capsule Opacification Development With Two Different Intraocular Lenses
NCT01734343 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 65
Last updated 2012-11-27
Summary
Age-related cataract is the main cause of impaired vision in the elderly population worldwide.
The only treatment that can restore functional visual ability is cataract surgery where the opacified crystalline lens is removed by phacoemulsification and an artificial intraocular lens is implanted into the remaining capsular bag. Cataract operations are generally very successful, with a low risk of serious complications.
The most common reason for impaired vision after uneventful cataract surgery in otherwise healthy eyes is the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). PCO is a physiological change (thickening, opacification and clouding) of the capsular bag expected after cataract surgery, because the lens epithelial cells (LECs) undergo hyperplasia and cellular migration. PCO is treated with Nd:YAG capsulotomy, a quick outpatient procedure that uses a laser to open a central hole in the posterior capsular bag.
Modifications in IOL design and material lead to a decrease in the incidence of PCO.
During the past two decades, refinements in surgical technique were made resulting in today's small incision phacoemulsification surgery. Nowadays a multitude of microincision IOLs are available, many of them similar but of course with some differences in regard to the chemical composition of the acrylic material and the IOL design.
The purpose of this study is to compare the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and the frequency of treatment between two different microincision IOLs over a period of 3 years.
Conditions
- Posterior Capsule Opacification
- Cataract
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
HOYA iMics Y-60H
same-day bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of intraocular lens HOYA iMics Y-60H in one eye
- DEVICE
-
PhysIOL microAY
same-day bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of intraocular lens PhysIOL microAY in one eye
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical University of Vienna
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Rupert Menapace, Prof. Dr. · Medical University of Vienna
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-05-31
- Completion
- 2012-06-30
Countries
- Austria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Influence of Two Different Preloaded Intraocular Lens (IOLs) on Posterior Capsule Opacification
NCT00673803 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Aqueous Flare of a Hydrophobic Acrylic Single-piece Open-loop IOL With Modified Material Surface Properties
NCT01767012 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Performance of Two Intraocular Lenses With Extended Depth of Vision
NCT05194150 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Capsule Opafication of Different Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: Vivinex iSert P261 vs.Clareon IOL
NCT04369482 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Capsule Opafication of Two Different Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses
NCT04196673 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of a UV-Absorbing Acrylic Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens
NCT00625313 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Optic Edge Design in a Silicone Intraocular Lens on Posterior Capsule Opacification
NCT00428363 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Visual Quality Following Aspheric Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation - a Comparative Clinical Study
NCT01544777 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Stability of Secondary Intraocular Lenses With no Capsular Support
NCT06345846 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Cell Ongrowth and Biocompatibility Study of Two Different (Hydrophobic Acrylic) Intraocular Lenses: IOL XY1 vs. IOL XY1A
NCT06708806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Physiological Responses at the Anterior Surface of Two (Hydrophobic Acrylic) Intraocular Lens Models
NCT04230629 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Visual Outcomes After Implantation of the POD AY GF F (PhysIOL) and the POD AY 26P F (PhysIOL)
NCT02981186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implantation of a Trifocal Hydrophobic IOL in Patients That Underwent Refractive Surgery
NCT04054427 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Study Investigating the Impact of Different IOL Designs on Subjective 2D and 3D Image Quality
NCT02409641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome of Two Surgical Methods for IOLImplantation in Eyes With Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome
NCT06053554 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Viusal Outcomes After Implantation of the POD 26% FineVision Toric (PhysIOL) and POD 26% Toric (PhysIOL)
NCT02426385 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Reading Performance in Patients With Acrysof IQ Vivity Versus Acrysof IQ
NCT05194657 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Results of Two Surgical Methods for Scleral IOL Implantation and Fixation in Eyes Without Capsular Support: Yamane- Versus 4-flanged Technique
NCT06102109 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Rotational Stability of the Acrysof, Tecnis and Envista Intraocular Lenses
NCT04345380 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Performance of an Extended Depth of Focus IOL in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality
NCT06624826 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL - iPure: a Randomised Study
NCT04329754 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Toric IOL Implantation and Opposite Clear Corneal Incision During Cataract Surgery to Correct Corneal Astigmatism
NCT01763151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Visual Performance, Patient Satisfaction and PCO Rate After Implantation of a Trifocal Hydrophobic IOL
NCT03306342 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Maximizing Visual Outcomes With Eyhance IOLs
NCT05611073 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of a Monofocal Hydrophobic IOL, Bi-Flex 877PAY With POB-MA Preloaded Injector
NCT06469541 ·Status: COMPLETED