Comparison of the Effect of Hydrophobic Acrylic and Silicone 3-piece IOLs on Posterior Capsule Opacification
NCT01936701 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2013-09-06
Summary
Age-related cataract is the main cause of impaired vision in the elderly population worldwide.
The only treatment that can restore functional visual ability is cataract surgery where the opacified crystalline lens is removed by phacoemulsification and an artificial intraocular lens is implanted into the remaining capsular bag. Cataract operations are generally very successful, with a low risk of serious complications.
The most common reason for impaired vision after uneventful cataract surgery in otherwise healthy eyes is the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO). PCO is a physiological change (thickening, opacification and clouding) of the capsular bag expected after cataract surgery, because the lens epithelial cells (LECs) undergo hyperplasia and cellular migration. PCO is treated with Nd:YAG capsulotomy, a quick outpatient procedure that uses a laser to open a central hole in the posterior capsular bag.
Modifications in IOL design and material lead to a decrease in the incidence of PCO.
During the past two decades, refinements in surgical technique were made resulting in today's small incision phacoemulsification surgery. Nowadays a multitude of microincision IOLs are available, many of them similar but of course with some differences in regard to the chemical composition of the acrylic material and the IOL design.
The purpose of this study is to compare the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and the frequency of treatment between two different microincision IOLs over a period of 2 years.
Conditions
- Posterior Capsule Opacification
- Cataract
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
bilateral cataract surgery
same-day bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of intraocular lens
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Medical University of Vienna
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2011-03-31
- Completion
- 2011-08-31
Countries
- Austria
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Aqueous Flare of a Hydrophobic Acrylic Single-piece Open-loop IOL With Modified Material Surface Properties
NCT01767012 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Posterior Capsule Opacification Development With Two Different Intraocular Lenses
NCT01734343 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Posterior Capsule Opafication of Different Hydrophobic Acrylic Intraocular Lenses: Vivinex iSert P261 vs.Clareon IOL
NCT04369482 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Pilot Study Simulating Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Healthy Subjects
NCT01873781 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Visual Performance With a Hydrophobic Aspheric Monofocal IOL
NCT03819582 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Pilot Study Investigating the Impact of Different IOL Designs on Subjective 2D and 3D Image Quality
NCT02409641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Photopic and Mesopic Multifocal IOL Performance
NCT06978556 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Rotational Stability of the Acrysof, Tecnis and Envista Intraocular Lenses
NCT04345380 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Rotation of an Intraocular Lens - HOYA Vivinex iSert P261
NCT03157375 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study to Compare Visual Performance of Two Trifocal IOLs
NCT03347981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Toric IOL Implantation and Opposite Clear Corneal Incision During Cataract Surgery to Correct Corneal Astigmatism
NCT01763151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL - iPure: a Randomised Study
NCT04329754 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cell Ongrowth and Biocompatibility Study of Two Different (Hydrophobic Acrylic) Intraocular Lenses: IOL XY1 vs. IOL XY1A
NCT06708806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes After Implantation of a Monofocal Hydrophobic IOL, Bi-Flex 877PAY With POB-MA Preloaded Injector
NCT06469541 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Performance of a Hydrophilic and a Hydrophobic Intraocular Lens of Similar Design
NCT03955796 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Function of Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
NCT07262021 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Acuity After the Combined Binocular Implantation of +2.75 Diopters and +3.25 Diopters Tecnis Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.
NCT02633072 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Performance of Two Intraocular Lenses With Extended Depth of Vision
NCT05194150 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Two Hydrophobic IOLs
NCT05639049 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Intraindividual Comparison of EMO IOLs
NCT05822089 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Low-add Multifocal vs. Monofocal IOLs
NCT03749161 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Capsule Bag Performance of a Novel Single-piece Acrylic IOL HOYA AF-1 NY-60
NCT07167589 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implantation of a Trifocal Hydrophobic IOL in Patients That Underwent Refractive Surgery
NCT04054427 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Visual Performance of an Extended Depth of Focus IOL in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality
NCT06624826 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation and Comparison of the Tecnis Symfony Optiblue and Tecnis Symfony IOLs
NCT06567834 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA