Iodine Mapping Using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism CT Versus Dual-Energy CT

NCT02890706 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 295

Last updated 2017-11-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparing two techniques (Subtraction and Dual Energy CT) for functional Chest CT for patients with suspected with pulmonary embolism.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Iodine Mapping using Subtraction in Pulmonary Embolism Computed Tomography versus Dual Energy Computed Tomography

Compare two techniques of the CT scanner

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Radboud University Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Monique Brink, MD · Radboud University Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-07-07
Primary Completion
2017-10-30
Completion
2017-10-30

Countries

  • Netherlands

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02890706 on ClinicalTrials.gov