Comparison Between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Patients in the Intensive Care Unit After Abdominal Surgery

NCT02874768 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2019-03-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This is a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients undergoing abdominal surgery will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: dexmedetomidine group and propofol group. In the dexmedetomidine group, patients will receive continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (infusion dosage range: 0.1 \~ 0.7 mcg/kg/h). In the propofol group, patients will receive continuous intravenous infusion of propofol (infusion dosage range: 0.3 \~ 1.6 mg/kg/h). Hemodynamics will be continuously monitored using a non-invasive monitoring with chest bioreactance technique at preset time points (0, 2, 4, 6, 12h and 24h). Clinical data such as vital signs, hemodynamic parameters, laboratory results and fluid balance will be recorded. The microcirculation will be examined by Cytocam. The following microcirculatory parameters will be investigated: total small vessel density, perfused small vessel density, microvascular flow index, and heterogeneity index. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays will be used to measure serum level of endocan, diamine oxidase, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin at preset time points. The primary goal of this study is to compare the effect on microcirculation between dexmedetomidine and propofol in intensive care unit patients after abdominal surgery.

Conditions

  • Microcirculation

Interventions

DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Patient receives continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine (infusion dosage range: 0.1 \~ 0.7 mcg/kg/h)

DRUG

Propofol

Patient receives continuous intravenous infusion of propofol (infusion dosage range: 0.3 \~ 1.6 mg/kg/h)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Yu-Chang Yeh, PhD · National Taiwan University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
89 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2016-08-31
Primary Completion
2018-07-20
Completion
2018-07-20

Countries

  • Taiwan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02874768 on ClinicalTrials.gov