MedTrace Logo

Hemodynamic and Cardiac Effects of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl by Intravenous Infusion as Adjuncts to General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Cancer Surgeries.

NCT07214714 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2025-10-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Background :

Major abdominal cancer surgery is among the most invasive procedures, often associated with extensive tissue damage, severe postoperative pain, and delayed recovery. Inadequate pain management can result in adverse physiological responses such as tachycardia, hypertension, prolonged immobility, and extended hospital stay. Moreover, poorly controlled pain may impair immune function and contribute to neuroendocrine, metabolic, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary complications. Therefore, effective analgesia is essential to improve patient outcomes and recovery.

Multimodal analgesia has emerged as the gold standard for managing postoperative pain in major abdominal surgery. It integrates regional techniques (such as epidural or intrathecal analgesia), peripheral nerve blocks (e.g., transversus abdominis plane block), systemic opioids, and non-opioid agents including NSAIDs and acetaminophen. This approach minimizes surgical stress, maintains hemodynamic stability, and facilitates early ambulation and discharge.

Opioids, particularly fentanyl, are widely used as intrathecal adjuvants due to their rapid onset and favorable analgesic profile. However, selective alpha-2 adrenergic receptor agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine are gaining attention for their sedative, analgesic, sympatholytic, and hemodynamic-stabilizing effects. Administered intrathecally, epidurally, or intravenously, they can enhance analgesia while reducing anesthetic requirements without causing profound sedation.

Conventional monitoring with heart rate and non-invasive blood pressure may overlook subtle variations in cardiac output. Electrical cardiometry (ICON®) provides continuous, non-invasive, beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac parameters and has been validated across different patient groups. Accordingly, the present study aims to compare intravenous dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to general anesthesia, focusing on their effects on hemodynamics and cardiac function in major abdominal cancer surgery using electrical cardiometry.

Conditions

  • Abdominal Cancer Surgeries

Interventions

DRUG

Fentanyl (IV)

Patients will receive Fentanyl loading dose of 1 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5-1 µg/kg/h.

DRUG

Dexmedetomidine

Patients will receive Dexmedetomidine loading dose of 0.5 µg/kg over 10 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.3-0.9 µg/kg/h.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-11-01
Primary Completion
2026-11-01
Completion
2026-12-01
FDA Drug
Yes

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07214714 on ClinicalTrials.gov