Effect of a Self-adhering Material in Dental Hypersensitivity
NCT02766127 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 17
Last updated 2017-03-24
Summary
Aim: To compare the desensitizing capacity of Vertise Flow™ (VF), a new self adhering material, in the treatment of dentine hypersensitivity (DH) in patients who are xerostomic due to radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Methods: A total of 17 patients were selected for the study. The study was conducted as a split-mouth randomized clinical trial comparing: 1) VF 2) Universal Dentin Sealant (UDS), 3) Clearfil Protect Bond (CPB) and 4) Flor-Opal® Varnish (FOV). Basal and stimulated salivary flow was recorded for each patient according to the method described by Sreebny. The pain experience was generated by a cold stimulus directly to a sensitive tooth surface and assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The response was recorded before the application of the materials (PRE-1), immediately after (POST-1), at 1-week (POST-2), 4-weeks (POST-3) and 12-week controls (POST-4).
Conditions
- Dentin Sensitivity
- Xerostomia
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Veritise Flow
Self-adhering composite
- OTHER
-
Universal Dentin Sealant
non-polymerizable, high molecular weight resin sealant
- OTHER
-
Clearfil Protect Bond
methacrylate-based resin, self-etching adhesive system
- OTHER
-
Flor-Opal® Varnish
fluoride-based varnish
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Università degli Studi di Sassari
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Egle Milia, Prof · Università degli Studi di Sassari
Study Design
- Allocation
- NA
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2014-06-30
- Completion
- 2015-12-31
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of Using Self-adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Repairing Old Defective Resin Composite Restorations Over 18 Months Follow up. (A Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06260644 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Using Bioactive Desensitizer Gel
NCT07323693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Treatment in Cariously Exposed Teeth
NCT06802549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of the Remineralizing and Antibacterial Effect of Natural Versus Synthetic Materials on Deep Carious Dentin
NCT04145102 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Two Types of Sealers in the Healing of Periapical Lesions
NCT06400030 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Self-etch Resin Based Sealant With and Without Prior Sandblasting
NCT04929327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digitized Assessment for the Survival of Mature Anterior Teeth With Periapical Lesion After One Step Regenerative Approach Using Different Asepsis Maneuvers
NCT03652129 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endodontic-Restorative Pre-Radiation Therapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
NCT04996641 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Self-etch Adhesive Using a Selective Etch Technique
NCT01369134 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Follow Up of a Fissure Sealant Placed With Different Adhesive Protocols: 2-Year Randomized Split Mouth Study
NCT02998814 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Study of Different Traditional and Bioactive Indirect Pulp Capping Materials
NCT06707311 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Antibacterial Effect of Nano Silver Fluoride vs Chlorhexidine on Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03186261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Retention and Caries Preventive Effect of Resin Based Sealants Versus ART Sealants
NCT02408601 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Effectiveness of a Bonding and a Fluoride Varnish for Long-term Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment.
NCT04813848 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of a Flowable Bulk Fill Composite Versus a Highly Viscous Glass-ionomer Cement in Primary Molars
NCT06166160 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of 3M™ ESPE™ Adper™ Scotchbond™ SE Self-Etch Adhesive in Class I and Class II Restorations in Adults
NCT00658138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Seventh Generation Bonding Agents as Short-Term Desensitizers Among Patients With Hypersensitivity
NCT04225247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Propolis As a Hemostatic Agent for Pulpotomy of Mature Permanent Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis Using Two Different Dressing Materials
NCT06679075 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Bioactive Restorative vs GIC Modified Glass Ionomer in Restoration of Cervical Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04363996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Investigation of Chemomechanical Parameters for an Efficient Disinfection of the Root Canal
NCT06949176 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Surgical Single Visit Endodontic Retreatment in Cases With Asymptomatic Apical Periodontitis Using Bioceramic Sealer
NCT06973135 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent
NCT06392685 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical And Radiographic Evaluation Of Nano-Propolis, Nano-Curcumin and MTA as Direct Pulp Capping Agents in Young Permanant Teeth
NCT06029023 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA