Composite Repair Using Silane Coupling Agent
NCT06392685 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75
Last updated 2024-04-30
Summary
Evaluation the influence of the use of silane coupling agent application as a separate step versus application of silane or acid resistance silane containing adhesives on the clinical performance of repaired posterior resin composite restorations according to Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria over one year.
Conditions
- Tooth Discoloration
- Hypersensitivity
- Tooth Fracture
- Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Silane coupling agent
Silane coupling agent (Porcelain primer) will be applied following the acid etch rinsing and drying step, for 30 seconds and then it will be thoroughly dried using air syringe then universal adhesive with regular silane will be actively applied for 20 seconds and then it will be light cured for 20 seconds and final restoration will be done
- OTHER
-
Adhesive containing silane.(Intervention 1 )
Universal adhesive with regular silane will be applied for 20 seconds, air thinned for 10 seconds and then it will be light cured for 20 seconds and final restoration will be done using same resin composite material
- OTHER
-
Acid resistance silane containing adhesive.(Intervention 2)
Acid resistance silane containing adhesive will be applied for 20 seconds, dry with gentle air for 3 seconds, then with stronger air and light cured for 10 seconds and final restoration will be done
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2024-07-31
- Completion
- 2025-07-31
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Performance of Milled Resin Composite in Restoration of Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth Over One Year
NCT04518371 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Three-Year Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Posterior Restorations: Amalgam vs Resin Composite
NCT02393989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Clinical Experience on the Quality of Obturation and Periapical Changes of Teeth Treated With Matched Cones in Combination With Bioceramic Sealer
NCT06260423 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Simplified-Shade Nano-Hybrid Composite With Full-Coverage Silane Coating and High-Performance Pulverized Fillers
NCT07334509 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Performance of Self Adhesive Giomer Containing Flowable Composite in Restoring Class V Cavities
NCT04944485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations.
NCT03283280 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment
NCT02071953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reminerlization Potential of Innovative Biomimetic Material in Caries White Spot Lesions
NCT03823612 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self- Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions
NCT04888676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation for Healing of Iatrogenic Perforation After Non Surgical Repair
NCT06991569 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of an Adhesive System on the Retention and Caries Prevention for Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT06608563 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Hydrophilic Fissure Sealants
NCT05127343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Sealants vs Conventional Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT03779893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Versus Resin Based Sealant
NCT04603573 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Incidence of Postoperative Pain After Using Different Types of Sealers
NCT05841290 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity
NCT03285360 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Clinical Effectiveness of Embrace Wetbond and Clinpro as Pits and Fissure Sealants in Young Permanent Molars
NCT02933463 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07003360 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of the Indirect Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth
NCT04561167 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive
NCT05928533 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Indirect Pulp Capping Agents for Permanent Teeth
NCT05425368 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Self Etch Giomer Based Fissure Sealant
NCT05336162 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Glass Ionomer Sealant Versus Resin Sealant for Pits and Fissures of the First Permanent Molars
NCT05988801 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate of Self-etch Resin Based Sealant With and Without Prior Sandblasting
NCT04929327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA