MedTrace Logo

Effectiveness of Bioactiveglass Air Abrasion Versus Fluoride Varnish in Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity

NCT03285360 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2019-01-31

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Will the use of Bioactive glass with air abrasion technology (Sylc) compared to Fluoride Varnish (Biflourid 10) affects the degree of pain in patients complaining from hypersensitivity due to non-carious lesions?

Conditions

  • Hypersensitivity Dentin
  • Tooth Hypersensitivity

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Sylc

a dry powder (calcium sodium phosphosilicate), based on NovaMin powder. Bottle of small and coarse particles will be used for the treatment

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

fluoride varnish (Bifluorid 10)

It is a rapid- drying suspension of equal amounts of sodium fluoride and calcium fluoride.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dina E Mohamed, Master · Assistant lecturer, Conservative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2017-10-01
Primary Completion
2018-12-01
Completion
2019-01-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03285360 on ClinicalTrials.gov