Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial - LV Endocardial
NCT02757976 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 8
Last updated 2020-09-04
Summary
This trial will compare two strategies for patients with Heart Failure, Left Ventricular systolic dysfunction, and intermediate QRS durations. The control group is conventional CRT. The experimental group is LVendo CRT
Conditions
- Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Conventional CRT
Patients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization. Conscious sedation or general anesthesia can be used for the implant procedure. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform coronary sinus venography at the time of implantation. The RA lead will be placed in the RA appendage or high RA. The RV lead should be placed at the RV apex or distal RV septum (R wave \> 7 mV, pacing threshold \< 1.5 V at a pulse-width of 0.5 ms). The LV lead should be positioned through the CS to an LV branch. The lead should be placed at one of the left ventricular venous branches, avoiding the LV apex and scar region identified by pre-implant imaging.
- DEVICE
-
LV endocardial CRT
Patients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame, and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance (TEE or ICE) at the time of implantation. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach, using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study. Special care will be taken to avoid the LV apex and transmural scar identified by pre-implant imaging.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator INDUSTRY
-
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-03-08
- Primary Completion
- 2019-06-20
- Completion
- 2019-06-20
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Correlating QLV Interval to Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Position in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
NCT02166762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Ventricular Synchronous Versus Sequential MultiSpot Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
NCT02914457 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
B-Left HF: Biventricular Versus Left Univentricular Pacing With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) Back-Up in Heart Failure Patients
NCT00187213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Site Left Ventricular (LV) Pacing
NCT00944125 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Optimization of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)Using Echocardiography and SonR
NCT01293526 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation to Optimize Hemodynamic Management of Left Ventricular Assist Devices Using the CardioMEMS™
NCT03247829 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
TARGET-LOAD Pilot Study Comparing Hemodynamics-guided LVAD Unloading Vs. Standard of Care
NCT04977310 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial
NCT00251251 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) on Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Function
NCT04153786 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Epicardial Versus Conventional Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01302470 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AMEND-CRT: Mechanical Dyssynchrony as Selection Criterion for CRT
NCT04225520 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dual-Site LV Pacing in CRT Non Responders: Multicenter Randomized Trial
NCT01059175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Electrophysiological Optimization of Left Ventricular Lead Placement in CRT
NCT02346097 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Combining Myocardial Strain and Cardiac CT to Optimize Left Ventricular Lead Placement in CRT Treatment
NCT01426321 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF)
NCT00267098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders
NCT05760924 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing As A Rescue Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-Response
NCT05884411 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
NCT01994252 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LV Endocardial Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy
NCT02174289 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-lead ECG to Effectively Optimize Resynchronization Devices: New CRT Recipients
NCT04083690 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
LV Only MPP With SyncAV
NCT03567096 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Survey of QRS Frequency at Various Left Ventricular Pacing Sites for Cardiac Resynchronization
NCT03253809 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Positioning Using MediGuide
NCT01917266 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Pilot Study Comparing the Programmed Delay Between the Atrial and Ventricle Interval
NCT00794183 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With RBBB
NCT05936294 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA