LV Only MPP With SyncAV
NCT03567096 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 101
Last updated 2025-02-21
Summary
The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the clinical benefits of left ventricle (LV) only pacing combined with automatic adjustment of AV timing (SyncAV) in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after 6 months of therapy.
This clinical investigation is a prospective, two-arm, randomized 1:1, multicenter feasibility study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of LV only with multipoint pacing (MPP) and SyncAV compared to bi-ventricular pacing with MPP and SyncAV. The clinical investigation will be conducted at approximately 7 centers in Europe and Canada. Approximately 120 subjects will be enrolled in the study. No site may enroll more than 33% of the total subjects.
Data will be collected at enrollment, CRT implant procedure, hospital pre-discharge, one and 6 months post implant. Enrollment data collection will include demographics, cardiovascular history, medication, echocardiography measurements and quality of life questionnaire. CRT implant procedure data collection will include implanted system information and lead location. The electrical conduction recording procedure will include surface ECG and device IEGM recordings during various pacing configurations at implant or up to 45 days post implant. In patients who consent to invasive measurements (expected target of at least 80 patients), a hemodynamic recording procedure will include invasive hemodynamic measurements during various pacing configurations which may take place during device implant or up to 45 days post implant. Hospital pre-discharge data collection will take place within 3 days after the CRT implant, electrical conduction recordings visit or hemodynamic recordings visit and will include system information, surface ECG, and device IEGMs.
In a subset of patients from selected centers that have access to this technology (expected 20 patients), non-invasive electrical activation data will be collected with body surface mapping within 45 days of the implant procedure.
Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either biventricular pacing with multipoint pacing (MPP) or LV-only pacing with MPP at the one-month (± 15 days) visit. The 6-month (± 15 days) post randomization follow up visit will include surface ECG, IEGMs, echocardiographic parameters and quality of life questionnaire.
Subjects participating in this clinical investigation will follow the hospital center standard of care from implant to 6 month follow up. The expected duration of enrollment is 1.5 year. The total duration of the clinical investigation is expected to be 2 years.
Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Left Bundle-Branch Block
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
BiV pacing with MPP and SyncAV
This cohort will receive Bi-Ventricular Pacing (left ventricle and right ventricle pacing) with MultiPoint Pacing of the left ventricle (two stimulation sites) and the SyncAV algorithm active.
- DEVICE
-
LV only pacing with MPP and SyncAV
This cohort will receive left ventricular only pacing (no right ventricle pacing) with MultiPoint Pacing of the left ventricle (two stimulation sites) and the SyncAV algorithm active.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator INDUSTRY
-
Abbott Medical Devices
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Bernarnd Thibault, MD · Montreal Heart Institute
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-10-09
- Primary Completion
- 2023-02-24
- Completion
- 2023-09-30
Countries
- Canada
- France
- Italy
- United Kingdom
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04110431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ENHANCE-Efficacy of the Presence of Right Ventricular Apical Pacing Induced Ventricular Dyssynchrony as a Guiding Parameter for Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Bradycardia and Normal Ejection Fraction
NCT01559311 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Evaluation of the Safety of Left Ventricular-left Ventricular (LV-LV) Delays and Its Effects on Mechanical Dyssynchrony
NCT01044784 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
REsynchronization Comparison In LBBB and Normal or Mildly Reduced VENTricular Function With CRT (REINVENT-CRT)
NCT05652218 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MultiPoint Pacing IDE Study
NCT01786993 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Application of Right Atrial Left Ventricular Fusion Pacing in Patients With CRT Indications
NCT03071978 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Evaluate the Superior Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization (SyncAVTM) Using the SyncAVTM Algorithm
NCT03961399 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Electrogram and Hemodynamic Characteristics of Adaptive LBBAP in Patients With Heart Failure or Bradycardia
NCT04738396 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial - LV Endocardial
NCT02757976 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Dual Site Left Ventricular (LV) Pacing
NCT00944125 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
B-Left HF: Biventricular Versus Left Univentricular Pacing With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) Back-Up in Heart Failure Patients
NCT00187213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Correlating QLV Interval to Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Position in Patients Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
NCT02166762 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimised MultiSite Pacing Vector Study
NCT03938090 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Application of Negative Atrioventricular Hysteresis in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT02903940 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effects of CRT Optimization as Assessed by Cardiac MR
NCT04763460 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Physiologic Response With Rate Adaptive Pacing Driven by Minute Ventilation and Accelerometer
NCT02003378 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Left Ventricular (LV) Lead Positioning Using MediGuide
NCT01917266 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Right Ventricular Function in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
NCT02169076 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
MultiPoint Pacing™ Post Market Study
NCT02832622 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Post-market Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized and Single-blinded Clinical Investigation to Evaluate Whether Cardiac Re-Synchronization Therapy (CRT) Using Automatic Continuous Atrioventricular (AV) Delay Optimization is Superior to CRT With Conventional Biventricular Stimulation (BiV).
NCT06044597 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
AMEND-CRT: Mechanical Dyssynchrony as Selection Criterion for CRT
NCT04225520 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-lead ECG to Effectively Optimize Resynchronization Devices: New CRT Recipients
NCT04083690 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Optimilization on Cardiac Perfusion, Contractile Force, and Clinical Performance in Patients With Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure
NCT00551681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Right Ventricular Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01163422 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Biventricular Versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure Patients With Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF)
NCT00267098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA