MedTrace Logo

ProGrip Mesh Repair vs Lichtenstein Operation

NCT02748629 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 143

Last updated 2016-10-06

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare clinical outcomes and to analyze cost-effectiveness following self-gripping, sutureless Parietex ProGrip Mesh to traditional Lichtenstein Operation with lightweight polypropylene mesh.

Conditions

  • Inguinal Hernia

Interventions

DEVICE

Covidien Parietex ProGrip Self-Fixating Mesh

DEVICE

Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh (<38g/m2 after absorption)

Serag Wiessner SERAMESH® PA 15x10 cm

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of Gdansk

    collaborator OTHER

  • Regional Health Center in Kartuzy, Poland

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mateusz T Zamkowski, MD · Regional Health Center in Kartuzy, Department of General Surgery

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-03-31
Primary Completion
2016-05-31
Completion
2016-10-31

Countries

  • Poland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02748629 on ClinicalTrials.gov