Complex Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biologic or Synthetic Mesh

NCT02041494 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 165

Last updated 2021-04-14

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Hernias are often treated using a prosthetic mesh to add support to the healing wound. Prosthetic meshes have been used for decades to repair ventral hernias, level 1 data regarding which type of mesh to use is limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of two types of prosthetic meshes: one that is made from pig skin (called a "biologic prosthetic"), and one that is made in a laboratory (called a "synthetic prosthetic"). This study will include some patients who have an infection in/near the hernia, and other patients who do not have an infection. We expect the synthetic mesh to be associated with a higher rate of early post-operative surgical site infection and fluid collections (seromas), while we expect the biologic mesh to be associated with a higher rate of recurrence.

Conditions

  • Hernia, Ventral

Interventions

DEVICE

Ventralight

DEVICE

Strattice

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

    collaborator NIH
  • Hobart Harris

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hobart W. Harris, M.D., M.P.H. · University of California, San Francisco

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-03-31
Primary Completion
2019-10-05
Completion
2019-10-05

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02041494 on ClinicalTrials.gov