Less Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty Using the Self-gripping Parietex Progrip Mesh
NCT01830452 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 400
Last updated 2013-04-12
Summary
Chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernioplasty is a common problem with an incidence of 11%. Many factors influence the onset and persistence of pain. Mesh characteristics and fixation have been pointed as important etiologic factors. This study compares two types of fixation for the same mesh. The mesh used is a lightweight parietex mesh. In the control group this mesh will be fixed with non absorbable sutures. In the study group sutures will not be needed because of self gripping microhooks on the surface of the mesh.
Methods: The HIPPO trial is a multicenter double blind randomized clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to the sutured mesh or the self-gripping mesh. Hernia repair will be done according to Lichtenstein as described by Amid et all. Included will be all unilateral primary inguinal hernia in man patients aged 18 years or older not meeting the exclusion criteria. Patients will be followed for two years. The main endpoint is the amount of post-operative chronic pain evaluated by VAS scores. The existence of neuropathic pain will be evaluated by the Paindetect questionnaire (and a bedside variant of the QST). Secondary endpoints are recurrence rate, post-operative complications, costs, hospital stay, QOL, return to work and daily activities, genital and sexual problems. To demonstrate a difference in VAS score of 10 with α=0.05 and power 80% a sample size of 400 patients is calculated.
Discussion: Hypothesized is that the self gripping non-sutured mesh (Parietex Progrip) will cause less post-operative and chronic pain without enhancing the recurrence rate.
Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Unilateral Inguinal Hernia
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Self-fixating Parietex Progrip Mesh
Lichtenstein hernioplasty using a self fixating Parietex Progrip mesh not needing any fixating devices
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator OTHER
-
Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Johan F Lange, Prof · Erasmus Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- FACTORIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2015-03-31
- Completion
- 2015-03-31
Countries
- Netherlands
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between Elliptical Domed Mesh Technique and Lichtenstein Technique in Inguinal Hernia
NCT01348477 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT01592942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ProGrip Mesh Repair vs Lichtenstein Operation
NCT02748629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Polypropylene Mesh Versus Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01141335 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
RCT Comparing Lightweight vs. Heavyweight Meshes in Incisional Hernia Repair
NCT04961346 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Progrip Ventral Study for Sublay Repair
NCT01622127 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Chronic Postoperative Pain After the Lichtenstein Groin Hernioplasty
NCT04839848 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing Pain After Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Using Two Different Types of Mesh Fixation
NCT02467140 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain
NCT00803985 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study on the Post-operative Pain and Other Outcomes of Mesh Fixation With Prolene vs Vicryl vs Skin Staples in Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair.
NCT07210424 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh
NCT02062775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Inguinodynia After Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03678272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predisposing Factors for Chronic Postherniotomy Pain
NCT00649142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tacking Mesh Versus Self-fixating Mesh for Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03247985 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Trial Comparing Two Different Polypropylene Meshes for Inguinal Hernias
NCT01825187 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Lichtenstein's Repair of Inguinal Hernia With Polypropylene Mesh Versus Surgisis
NCT00614419 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study on Self-adhesive Mesh for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT00960011 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair With Self-fixating Parietex™ ProGrip™ Mesh
NCT01481376 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study Evaluating the Impact of Mesh Pore Size on Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT02500056 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Patient Perceived Pain and Satisfaction Between Lightweight and Heavyweight Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT01638221 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Glubran Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT00659542 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Long-term Follow-up of Lichtenstein's Operation Versus Mesh Plug Repair
NCT01637818 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Staples Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Mesh Fixation in Inguinal Hernia Repair in Terms of Postoperative Pain
NCT07261189 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Absorbable Sutures , Non Absorbable Sutures or Biologic Fibrin Glue for Protesic Mesh Fixing in Lichtenstein Technique for Primitive Groin Hernia Repair: a Randomized Prospective Multicentric Trial
NCT02011698 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA