Comparison of Different Meshes in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT02712827 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150
Last updated 2018-11-27
Summary
The placement of mesh is important in hernia surgery as it helps to reduce recurrence, yet the method of fixation of mesh may cause pain after surgery. In laparoscopic hernia repair, surgeon uses different methods to fix the mesh in large hernia defects or bilateral inguinal hernias. Progrip is a special mesh developed by manufacturer that it can be self-gripped to tissue, as a result no fixation is required after placement. There are few data about Progrip in laparoscopic hernia repair. In this randomized controlled trial we would like to compare the use of Progrip with the "conventional" mesh in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surgery is performed in the usual manner; prior to placement of mesh, surgeon will get the randomization result for that particular patient: Progrip and non-Progrip group. No fixation is required for Progrip group, while fixation with fibrin glue is needed for non-Progrip group. Intraoperative data (e.g. mesh deployment time, operative time, etc) will be collected. Patients will be assessed in clinic at 2-week, 3-month, 6-month and 1-year interval after surgery. Additional visits may be arranged if considered necessary. At follow up patient will be seen by surgeon first to review the wound condition and to look for any recurrence; while other post-operative data including total analgesic usage (number of tablets), return to normal activities (days), return to work (days), pain score etc will be assessed and recorded by a trained nurse who is blinded to the treatment that patient received. Any hernia recurrence will be recorded and treated accordingly. Primary aim of this study is to look for any difference of the 2 groups in terms of postoperative pain and quality of life scores.
Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Progrip
Self-fixating mesh
- PROCEDURE
-
Non-Progrip
Non self-fixating mesh with the use of glue
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The University of Hong Kong
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Dominic, Chi Chung Foo, MBBS · The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2018-05-31
- Completion
- 2018-07-31
Countries
- Hong Kong
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
NCT01592942 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03276871 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Macroporous Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
NCT02023203 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mesh Fixation Versus Non Fixation in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernioplasty
NCT06258317 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair With Self-fixating Parietex™ ProGrip™ Mesh
NCT01481376 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02920307 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bilateral Laparoscopic Repair of Groin Hernias With One Large Self-fixating Mesh (ProGripTM)
NCT02525666 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study of a New Laparoscopic Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair With Mesh
NCT00138957 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair
NCT06240858 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ProGrip Mesh Repair vs Lichtenstein Operation
NCT02748629 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomised Controlled Trial on Pre-peritoneal Drainage After Totally Extra-peritoneal Hernioplasty for Inguinal Hernia
NCT02762747 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Self Fixating Versus Stapled Mesh for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT03856710 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Efficiency/Safety Study of Surgical Tissue Glue to Treat Inguinal Hernias
NCT01669837 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Parietex Progrip Study
NCT00827944 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
ProGripTM Self-Gripping Polyester Mesh in Incisional Hernia Prevention
NCT03912662 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Progrip Versus ProFlor: Two Fixation Free Devices for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06556498 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Chronic Pain After Inguinal Hernia Repair, the ONSTEP Technique Versus the Laparoscopic Approach
NCT01960777 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Strattice in Repair of Inguinal Hernias
NCT00681291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
SIngle Port vs Standard TEP for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT02302937 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Plastic Covering Method for Self-gripping Mesh Placement in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT04394338 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Fixating Mesh Versus Mesh Fixation With Tissue Glue in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
NCT06412445 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Less Chronic Pain After Lichtenstein Hernioplasty Using the Self-gripping Parietex Progrip Mesh
NCT01830452 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair by a 3D ENDOLAP Visible Mesh With or Without LiquiBand Fix 8 Mesh Fixation
NCT02781870 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3 Fixation Devices in Laparoscopic Ventral Herniotomy
NCT01534780 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Outcome After Lichtenstein Operation vs. ProGrip Patch Repair of Inguinal Hernia
NCT01026935 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA