Comparative Evaluation of Ambu AuraGain, LarySeal Pro and I-gel in Pediatric Airway Management for Day-Case Surgery Under Controlled Ventilation
NCT07274280 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 165
Last updated 2026-04-21
Summary
This study aims to compare the Ambu AuraGain, LarySeal Pro LMA, and i-gel regarding their insertion characteristics, ventilation efficacy, risk of gastric insufflation, fiberoptic view quality, intraoperative and postoperative airway-related complications, and hemodynamic stability.165 consecutive pediatric patients aged 2-9 years, weighing 10-30 kg, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, and scheduled for elective day-case surgery suitable for supraglottic airway device (SGAD) use.Patients will be randomly assigned (n= 55 per group) using a computer-generated random number sequence (www.random.org) to one of three groups:
* Group I: Ambu® AuraGain TM (Ambu Ltd Xiang Yu Xiamen, Fujian, China)
* Group II: LarySeal Pro® LMA (Flexicare Medical Limited, Cynon Valley Business Park, Mountain Ash, UK).Patients will receive oral midazolam before anesthesia, followed by standard monitoring, induction with sevoflurane, fentanyl, and atracurium, and insertion of an appropriately sized SGAD by experienced anesthesiologists. Ventilation quality, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), fiberoptic glottic view, and gastric insufflation by ultrasound will be assessed. Anesthesia will be maintained with controlled ventilation and cuff pressure adjusted to 60 cmH₂O. At the end, neuromuscular blockade will be reversed, devices removed upon awakening, and patients observed for complications such as laryngospasm, Outcome parameter (s):
* Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP).
* Demographic and Clinical Data.
* Hemodynamics.
* Insertion Data.
* Peak Airway Pressure (Ppeak).
* Fiberoptic Glottic View Assessment.
* Ultrasound Assessment of Gastric Insufflation.
* Perioperative Complications.bronchospasm, or sore throat.
* Group III: I-gelTM (Intersurgical Ltd, Berkshire, RG41 2RZ, UK).
Conditions
- Airway Control
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
supraglottic airway device
use of supraglottic airway device as an airway control device for pediatric patients during day case surgery under controlled ventilation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kasr El Aini Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 2 Years
- Max Age
- 9 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-07-15
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
A Randomized Comparison of Pediatric I-gel, Air-Q With Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT02757820 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Ambu AuraOnce Versus Ambu AuraGain LM in Children
NCT02811042 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect Of I-Gel And Ambu Aura-I Use On Laryngofaryngeal Mucosa
NCT04062747 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Two Supraglottic Airway Devices (Ambu AuraGain vs Air Q-3) in Terms of Performance Characteristics.
NCT06914453 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fiberoptic Evaluation of i-Gel and Air-Q sp3G Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Patients
NCT07141498 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ambu Aura-i and Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airways as a Conduit for Tracheal Intubation in Children
NCT01535742 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Distance From the Glottis to the Grille in Children
NCT03156166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-Gel vs Ambu Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures
NCT02938039 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT02878005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ambu Auragain and I-Gel Supraglottic Airways in Adult Patients at an Ambulatory Surgery Center
NCT04286581 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
AuraGain and iGel Crossover Comparison
NCT02644837 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Air Q Laryngeal Airway Versus the AmbuAura Gain as a Conduit for Endotracheal Intubation
NCT05607433 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of the I-gel and Air-Q Supraglottic Airways as Conduits for Tracheal Intubation in Children
NCT02189590 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT05347680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain Versus LMA Supreme in Children
NCT02380768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLED TRAIL COMARING LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION DISPOSABLE AND I-gel IN PEDIATRIC PATIENT
NCT05503277 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel vs AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through SGA
NCT04680169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Ambu Aura-i Versus AirQ in Children
NCT01692522 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Weight-based Versus External Ear-size Based Technique for Selection of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Surgical Patients.
NCT03931122 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the I-gel and the Self-pressurised Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children
NCT02140008 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Three Supraglottic Airway Devices ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway, Air-Q LMA and Ambu AuraGain
NCT04045899 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing the Efficiency of Three Third-generation Supraglottic Airways as an Intubation Route
NCT02975466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Air QTM Intubating Airway Versus Ambu-Aura Intubating Laryngeal Mask
NCT04195035 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The New Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable
NCT02884843 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel Versus Air-Q LMA for Pediatric Patients
NCT04458064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA