Comparison of the Clinical Performances of Air-Q SP 3G and i-Gel
NCT04951089 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80
Last updated 2022-04-15
Summary
Establishing a definitive airway defined as a tube placed in the trachea with cuff inflated below the vocal cords is the first priority in the airway management of the pre-hospital trauma patient, according to the last edition of the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) textbook, of the American College of Surgeons. However, studies revealed that the success rate of tracheal intubation in the prehospital setting using direct laryngoscopy (DL), the standard intubation technique is suboptimal. The Advance Trauma Life Support suggested the use of Supraglottic Airway Devise (SAD) in managing the difficult airway. The air-Q SP 3G was introduced as an alternative for managing the difficult airway. The i-gel is proposed as supraglottic device made of a medical grade thermoplastic elastomer. The unique design of both devices is that a cuff is not needed to be inflated .
A randomize controlled trail will be conduce. Participants will insert the both supraglottic devices to compare performance of ventilation and oxygenation of the patients.
The insertion will be performed on age 18-75 year patients, scheduled for elective surgery with general anesthesia. The SAD use in the study will be a single use i-gel size 4 or 5 and the air-Q SP 3G- size 4 or 5 For induction of anesthesia all patients will receive premedication. After 3 min of preoxygenation anesthesia will induce with up to 2 mcg/Kg fentanyl and 2-3 mg propofol Neuromuscular blockade will be obtained with rocuronion.
The participant will performed one insertion of the i-gel or the air-Q SP 3G on the patient while manual in-line stabilization of the neck Primary outcome: time to success insertion of SAD Secondary outcome : duration in seconds of insertion
Conditions
- Anesthesia
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
i-gel Supraglottic device insertion
i-gel insertion for oxygenation
- DEVICE
-
Air-Q SP 3G Supraglottic device insertion
Air-Q SP 3G insertion for oxygenation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Bnai Zion Medical Center
lead OTHER_GOV
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-07-30
- Completion
- 2022-10-31
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices: I-gel and the Self-pressurized Air-q in Elderly Patients
NCT04365192 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparing the Efficiency of Three Third-generation Supraglottic Airways as an Intubation Route
NCT02975466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study of Two Supraglottic Airway Devices Used for Patients Under General Anesthesia
NCT01001078 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Clinical Efficacy of Supraglottic Airway Device, Self-pressurized Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA -SP) in Adult Patients: Comparison With Classic-laryngeal Airway (c-LMA)
NCT02206438 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
I-gel vs AuraGain for Bronchoscopic Intubation Through SGA
NCT04680169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Comparing the Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT02856672 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT02878005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of the VBM Intubating Laryngeal Tube and the I-Gel
NCT03067246 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the Ambu AuraGain
NCT05347680 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Glottic View Using Supraglottic Devices in Pediatric Patients
NCT02532465 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A RANDOMIZED CONTROLED TRAIL COMARING LARYNGEAL TUBE SUCTION DISPOSABLE AND I-gel IN PEDIATRIC PATIENT
NCT05503277 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Fiberoptic Endotracheal Intubation Between the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction and the LMA Protector
NCT04618926 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Does the Use of the GlideRite® Endotracheal Tube in Combination With the I-gel® Improve Intubation Success Rate?
NCT01265862 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The New Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable
NCT02884843 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The i-GelTM. A Randomized, Crossover Study With the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSealTM in Anesthetized Pediatric Patients
NCT01425151 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fiberoptic Evaluation of i-Gel and Air-Q sp3G Supraglottic Airway Devices in Pediatric Patients
NCT07141498 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of I-gel to the Laryngeal Mask Airway
NCT00706823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low Skill Fibreoptic Intubation I-gel vs Air-Q
NCT02663843 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
LMA Unique TM & the Self Pressurized Air-Q TM Intubating Laryngeal Airway in Children
NCT01385761 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Type of Laryngeal Mask : I-Gel & LMA ProSeal
NCT00624403 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Blind Intubation Through The Self-Pressurised Disposable Air-Q Laryngeal Intubation Mask: An International Multicentre Trial
NCT01906060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Laryngeal Mask and I-gel to Laryngoscope by Novice Operators in Simulated Difficult Airway
NCT02224027 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Proseal
NCT01328405 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway and the Laryngeal Tube Suction During Spontaneous Ventilation
NCT02859922 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Compressions With Asynchronous Ventilations Using I-gel Device Versus 30:2 Approach During Simulated OHCA
NCT04736446 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA