Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions

NCT02212977 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 109

Last updated 2016-10-18

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Hypothesis is that incision closure with octylcyanoacrylate is inferior to closure with stitches in Port a Cath patients, who, as a population, are at increased risk for complications. All adult patients who present for initial Port a Cath placement during the recruitment period will be eligible to participate in the study. Subjects will be randomized to either skin incision closure with standard stitches or closure with skin glue. Time to complete skin closure and costs of closure will be compared. Patients will be evaluated approximately one month and three months from the procedure to assess for complications of wound breakdown or infection, as well as for the appearance of the Port a Cath incision.

Conditions

  • Port-A-Cath Placement
  • Octylcyanoacrylate

Interventions

DEVICE

Octylcyanoacrylate

Skin incision closure with topic skin adhesive Octylcyanoacrylate

PROCEDURE

Suture

Skin incision closure with standard subcuticular technique using a running 4-0 Polysorb suture

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Charles Kim, MD · Duke University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-09-30
Primary Completion
2015-09-30
Completion
2015-10-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02212977 on ClinicalTrials.gov