Optimization of the Nursing Time After the Use of Tissue Adhesives During the Chest Port Placement on Patients Treated With Chemotherapy Versus Sutures
NCT04848389 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 71
Last updated 2023-09-13
Summary
Skin adhesive (Octyl cyanoacrylate - LIQUID BAND©) is increasingly used instead of suture for sutures on the superficial plane of the skin.
It is frequently used in children, in traumatology and in plastic surgery. Several randomized trials have shown satisfactory results of the glue compared to suture in terms of infections and scar dehiscence, and aesthetics after abdominoplasty and mammoplasty.
In the field of port-a-cath® placement in oncology:
* The use of skin adhesive can save substantial nursing time, which makes it possible to consider the transition of this technique into routine patient management. Potential benefits include nurses managing large numbers of patients in day hospitals, and patients no longer needing a nurse for suture removal.
* Cancer and chemotherapy toxicity can alter patients' body image and view of themselves. The presence of a scar can be traumatic for some patients. The second goal of this study is to test whether the use of glue can improve the appearance of the scar following port-a-cath® placement, an area in which there are divergent results.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Skin Adhesive procedure
The scar is closed in 2 planes. The subcutaneous plane is closed with an absorbable 3/0 vicryl-type thread, the cutaneous plane is closed by applying skin adhesive. A drying time of 25 seconds is necessary to obtain a satisfactory seal.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard suture procedure
The scar is closed in 2 planes. The subcutaneous plane is closed with an absorbable thread of the 3/0 Vicryl-type, the cutaneous plane is closed with the same thread with an subcutaneous stitch.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Lynda SALMI, MD · Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-02-03
- Completion
- 2023-04-30
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Octylseal Surgical Adhesive in General Surgery
NCT01514383 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outcomes Comparing Different Methods of Skin Closure in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery.
NCT02936063 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Adhesive Glue With Skin Suture for Repair of Episiotomy
NCT00840788 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Skin Closures at Cesarean Delivery, Glue vs Subcuticular Sutures.
NCT04371549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial of Subcuticular Staples Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Section Skin Closure
NCT01753518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Replacing Buried Sutures With Tissue Adhesive on Aesthetic Outcome of Surgical Wounds.
NCT03425370 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Closure Techniques and Scar Appearance
NCT01352533 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Staples Versus Suture for Cesarean Wound Closure
NCT01008449 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Aesthetic Surgical Wound Closure by a Single Layer in Comparison With Traditional Multi-layer Closure
NCT05166681 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Techniques for Closing the Skin After a Cesarean Delivery
NCT00293683 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
NCT00933829 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Interrupted Versus Continuous Subcuticular Skin Suturing in Elective Cesarean Section.
NCT03120806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mass Continous Suture With PDS Versus Interrupted Suture With Thread on Major Abdominal Incision
NCT03801421 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Investigating Cyanoacrylate Glue to Prevent Surgical Site Infection Following Breast Surgery
NCT02779296 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations
NCT00681070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Analysis of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Section
NCT06543329 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
NCT02547077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Skin Closure With Tissue Adhesives vs. Subcuticular Suture After Robotic Urogynecologic Procedures
NCT03891004 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum-Assisted Dressings (V-AD) in the Management of Open Chest Wounds
NCT02803164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adhesive Tape in Episiotomy Repair
NCT02608671 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Subcuticular Suture Versus Running Horizontal Mattress Suture Closure of Linear Wounds on the Trunk and Extremities
NCT05263713 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Versus Glue (Dermabond) Closure During Cesarean Delivery
NCT02831946 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Staples Versus Dermabond for Closure of the Skin After Cesarean Section
NCT01261715 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4