A Randomized Post-market Study to Evaluate Zip Device Compared to Sutures for Laceration Repair in Pediatrics and Adults
NCT03199456 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26
Last updated 2018-09-24
Summary
The Zip-009 clinical investigation will enroll 26 paediatric and adult subjects requiring laceration repair and fulfilling the eligibility criteria for the clinical investigation. The investigation is designed to evaluate the time and cost savings and the satisfaction and outcomes of the Zip device compared to conventional sutures. The subjects will be randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to either the Zip Surgical Skin Closure Device group or the Standard of Care sutures group. The investigation consists of one screening/baseline visits at day 0 where the subject will be treated with either the Zip device or sutures, and thereafter two follow up telephone calls at day 10 and day 30. The Zip device/sutures will be removed prior the first follow up call day 10. The duration of the investigation is estimated to 5 months, including a 4-month recruitment period and 1-month follow up period.
Conditions
- Laceration
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Zip surgical skin closure device
Zip surgical skin closure device manufactured by ZipLine Medical, Inc. is a CE-marked, non-invasive, single use device that is designated to provide closure of the skin layer for lacerations or surgical incisions.
- DEVICE
-
Standard of Care sutures
Standard of Care sutures according to the hospitals current clinical praxis.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
ZipLine Medical Inc.
lead INDUSTRY
Principal Investigators
-
Pia Malmquist, M.D. · Funktionsområde Akutsjukvård Barn Solna, Astrid Lindgrens Barnsjukhus, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 4 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2017-06-16
- Primary Completion
- 2018-07-25
- Completion
- 2018-08-24
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Sweden
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Tissue Adhesive Vs. Absorbable Suture Vs. Non-Absorbable Suture
NCT00292513 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Zip® Surgical Skin Closure Device vs. Staples for Skin Closure in Subjects Having Undergone Bilateral Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02460172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interrupted Subdermal Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis
NCT03327922 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ZIPS Study - Zip Incision Approximation vs. STAPLE
NCT02255877 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
NCT02547077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
NCT02212977 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
NCT00933829 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes Comparing Different Methods of Skin Closure in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery.
NCT02936063 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Outcomes of Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures in Pediatric Facial Lacerations
NCT00681070 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study Comparing Two Different Techniques for Closing the Skin After a Cesarean Delivery
NCT00293683 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Tissue Adhesives in Port Site Closure
NCT05492721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Suture Versus Glue (Dermabond) Closure During Cesarean Delivery
NCT02831946 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut for Linear Wound Closure
NCT03303027 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial of Subcuticular Staples Versus Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Section Skin Closure
NCT01753518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Orthopaedic Surgical Wound Closure Comparison Study
NCT05251064 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Suture Versus Staples for Closure of the Skin After Caesarean Section.
NCT01217567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suturing Distance From the Wound Edge, 2 mm vs 5 mm
NCT03330041 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Straight Line and W-plasty Techniques for Linear Wound Closure
NCT05074199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Staples Versus Dermabond for Closure of the Skin After Cesarean Section
NCT01261715 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Adhesive Latch Device to Subcuticular Skin Closure at the Time of Cesarean Section
NCT03052647 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Running Locking Suture vs Standard Running Suture in Surgical Wounds
NCT06288009 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
To Evaluate The Skin Closure Time, Parents' Satisfaction, Post Operative Mental Health, Wound Cosmesis and Wound Complication Of Skin Closure Using Adhesive Glue, Adhesive Tape And Suture In Paediatric Surgery Patients
NCT06713772 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Standard Wound Closure Techniques Versus TissuGlu® Surgical Adhesive
NCT01791504 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3