Dyed vs. Undyed Polyglactin Sutures in Cutaneous Surgery
NCT07078669 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2025-07-22
Summary
Purpose - This exploratory, split-wound study aims to evaluate the potential difference in skin reactions to two different types of sutures, dyed and undyed, used to close wounds after surgery. The study will assess whether dyed sutures to elicit increased tissue reactivity like redness, itching, and scarring and whether undyed sutures may be more optimal for wound healing and cosmetic response. Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring.
Primary Objective - The primary objective is to assess the response of wounds closed with both dyed and undyed sutures after cutaneous surgery to determine if there is a difference in wound healing and tissue reactivity with one compared to the other.
Enrollment into the study and data collection is expected to take approximately 3-6 months. Follow-up visits will be chosen at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery, which is standard practice for monitoring healing and checking for complications such as infection or abnormal scarring.
Conditions
- Wound Closure
- Suture Materials
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Polyglactin 910 (Dyed)
Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture dyed (violet) with colorants such as D\&C Violet No. 2 present.
- DEVICE
-
Polyglactin 910 (Undyed)
Half the wound for each participant will be sutured using Polyglactin 910 suture Undyed
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
West Virginia University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sarah Camplbell, MD · West Virginia University-Dermatology
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2026-01-31
- Completion
- 2026-01-31
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Postoperative Pain and Skin Closure Methods After Cesarean Section
NCT02028000 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Closure Techniques and Scar Appearance
NCT01352533 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
NCT02547077 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Vac Polypropylene Suture Pilot Study
NCT02929238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Running Subcuticular Suture Versus Running Horizontal Mattress Suture Closure of Linear Wounds on the Trunk and Extremities
NCT05263713 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section
NCT06760026 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Granuloma in Body Contouring Surgery
NCT00223132 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Outcomes Comparing Different Methods of Skin Closure in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery.
NCT02936063 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate Together With a Self-adhering Mesh
NCT01658163 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Topical Skin Adhesive to Subcuticular Suture Closure of Implantable Port Incisions
NCT02212977 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Barbed Suture Versus Non-Barbed Suture for Posterior Colporrhaphy
NCT04658784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
6-0 Fast Absorbing Gut Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut for Linear Wound Closure
NCT03303027 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Straight Line and W-plasty Techniques for Linear Wound Closure
NCT05074199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT05966961 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Triclosan-antibacterial Sutures Efficacy on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Clean-contaminated Wounds
NCT04256824 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Cosmetic Outcomes of Lacerations Repaired Using Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
NCT00933829 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Analysis of Subcuticular Suture Materials in Cesarean Section
NCT06543329 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Interrupted Subdermal Suture Spacing During Linear Wound Closures and the Effect on Wound Cosmesis
NCT03327922 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Antibacterial-coated Sutures at Time of Cesarean
NCT03386240 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Antiseptic-Coated Sutures and Pancreatic Fistula Risk After Pancreatoduodenectomy
NCT07318493 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Sutures vs Staples for High Tension Closures
NCT06638736 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Investigating Cyanoacrylate Glue to Prevent Surgical Site Infection Following Breast Surgery
NCT02779296 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparing Polyglactin vs Polypropylene Sutures for Rectus Sheath Closure
NCT07280975 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy
NCT01907542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA