Barriers for the Uptake of LaparoScopic Hysterectomy
NCT02167672 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 1200
Last updated 2019-03-20
Summary
Hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus) is the most common major gynaecological operation in women in developed countries. In Queensland, 6000 women require a hysterectomy for irregular periods, benign tumours or pelvic pain every year. Surgical approaches to surgical removal of the uterus (womb) include Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (LH), Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH) and Abdominal Hysterectomy through an abdominal incision (AH).
It is widely accepted that LH and VH are less invasive surgical procedures, cause less bleeding, surgical complications and pain and are associated with quicker recovery from surgery than the more invasive AH. In a clinical trial comparing LH and AH we recently demonstrated that LH outperforms AH with regards to cost effectiveness causing less total health-services cost than AH.
Implementation of LH in Queensland could save $9.8 million every year. Despite the evidence for LH and VH, 2600 hysterectomies (43%) are still performed through an open, abdominal incision. In brief, a common but outdated operation is still performed regularly causing not only unnecessary pain, surgical adverse events and longer hospital stay but also increased healthcare costs.
This study will assess reasons why a significant number of gynaecologists and patients prefer AH over LH (Barriers to the uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy). We will survey specialist gynaecologists as well as patients who have had a hysterectomy for different health reasons. Based on the information from the survey the investigators will develop an intervention to increase the rate of laparoscopic hysterectomies in Queensland and pilot test it.
Conditions
- Hysterectomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Queensland University of Technology
collaborator OTHER -
Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Andreas Obermair · Queensland Health
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2014-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2016-04-30
- Completion
- 2018-12-31
Countries
- Australia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation of an Outpatient Protocol in Patients Operated for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT05659303 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Subtotal and Total Hysterectomy
NCT05421156 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Health-Related QoL Among Women Receiving Hysterectomy in NTUH
NCT00155870 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Radical Hysterectomy: Evolution Of Surgical Approach and Related Outcomes
NCT03577613 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study Comparing Conventional vs. Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT00485355 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy-RALH- Postoperative Complications, Quality of Life and Health Economics
NCT01761721 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Examining the Long-Term Risks of Oophorectomy
NCT00655447 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy - Outpatient Versus Inpatient Regimen
NCT02933047 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
NCT05960292 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Outcomes Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy
NCT01289314 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT00614211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Benefits and Limits of Laparoscopic Surgery for Uterine Fibroids
NCT00860002 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study of Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at a Teaching Institution
NCT01581905 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety, Efficacy and Operability of Using the New Tissue Containment System During Laprascopic Hysterectomy
NCT04423172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Study Comparing Subtotal vs Total Hysterectomy Long Term Outcomes
NCT06802198 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Function After Hysterectomy With or Without Fimbriectomy or Salpingectomy
NCT01782807 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
2-D and 3-D Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02610985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Via a Single Port, Peri-umbilical Technique Versus a Conventional Laparoscopic Technique
NCT01830738 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
VCare Versus SecuFix Uterine Manipulator for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06398769 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial on Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Robotic Hysterectomy
NCT00895284 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy: Single- vs. Multi-port Laparoscopic Access
NCT03373513 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02118974 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Blood Loss in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy by Ligation the Uterine Arteries in Different Techniques.
NCT06875518 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tissue Removal During Hysterectomy: The Effect of Vaginal Versus Abdominal Morcellation on Surgical Outcomes
NCT02703246 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA