MedTrace Logo

Dismembered Pyeloplasty With and Without After Coming Stent

NCT02138877 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2016-01-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

to compare outcome of pyeloplasty in pediatric population less than 6 months in age using an after coming stent versus stentless pyeloplasty.

Conditions

  • Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction
  • Pyeloplasty
  • Neonatal Hydronephrosis
  • Obstructive Uropathy
  • Urinary Stent

Interventions

PROCEDURE

After coming stent after dismembered pyeloplasty

Dismembered pyeloplasty through lumbar incision. The patients who are randomized to the after coming stent arm, an after coming stent is inserted. Distal part of it is positioned in the mid ureter. The proximal end is passed through the renal parenchyma (usually the lower kidney calyx) to be exteriorized through stab wound and fixed to the skin. The size of external stent is 4-5 F.

PROCEDURE

Stentless dismembered pyeloplasty

Dismembered pyeloplasty through lumbar incision. No stents are inserted

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Mohammed S ElSheemy, A professor · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
6 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-01-31
Primary Completion
2015-03-31
Completion
2015-06-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02138877 on ClinicalTrials.gov