Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Double J Stent Versus Percutaneous Feeding Tube Placement Following Open Pyeloplasty in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Single-center Study

NCT06847841 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 140

Last updated 2025-02-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Open pyeloplasty is a common surgical intervention for pediatric patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Post-operative management strategies, including the use of a double J stent and a percutaneous feeding tube, vary widely. While both options have demonstrated effectiveness in drainage, their relative clinical outcomes, costs, and overall value in pediatric urology remain unclear. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these two post-operative interventions in pediatric patients undergoing open pyeloplasty.

Conditions

  • Pyeloplasty
  • Complications of Surgical Procedures or Medical Care
  • Hospital Stay

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Double J Stent Placement

Patient in whom a DJS will be placed for post op drainage

PROCEDURE

Percutaneous Feeding Tube Placement

Patient in whom a PrcFT will be placed for post op drainage

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hayat Abad Medical Complex, Peshawar.

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Abdul Haseeb, MBBS, MRCS · Institute Of kidney Diseases

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
2 Years
Max Age
16 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-01-10
Primary Completion
2025-07-10
Completion
2025-07-10

Countries

  • Pakistan

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06847841 on ClinicalTrials.gov