Primary Urethral Realignment vs. Suprapubic Cystostomy for Initial Management of Pediatric Pelvic Fracture Urethral Injury

NCT03468387 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42

Last updated 2018-05-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

It is prospective randomized comparative clinical trial comparing primary urethral realignment vs. suprapubic cystostomy in initial management of pediatric pelvic fracture urethral injury regarding:

1. The success rate after initial intervention.
2. The need for urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.
3. The success rate of urethroplasty in the failed realignment group and cystostomy group.

Conditions

  • Urethral Injury

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Primary realignment

Endoscopic realignment of rupture urethra over a urethral catheter

PROCEDURE

Suprapubic cystostomy

Percutaneous cystostomy catheter will be inserted under sonographic guidance

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
1 Year
Max Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-06-01
Primary Completion
2021-06-01
Completion
2021-06-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03468387 on ClinicalTrials.gov