MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices

NCT02339519 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 90

Last updated 2015-12-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aimed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of LMA Supreme, LMA Classic and LMA Fastrach regarding ease of insertion, repositioning, insertion time, effects on hemodynamic parameters, provision of adequate and safe airway, and oropharyngeal and systemic complications.

Conditions

  • Airway Management

Interventions

DEVICE

LMA CLASSIC

Classic LMA consists of a mask with a surrounding inflatable bag compatible to the shape of the hypopharynx and a tube that has a 30° angle with a mask.

DEVICE

LMA FASTRACH

Fastrach LMA has similar features to the LMA Classic, but it is designed to provide upper airway during intubation via blind intubation or fiberoptic assistance. It has a rigid handle that allows one-handed insertion, removal or adjustment.

DEVICE

LMA SUPREME

Supreme LMA is a novel, sterile, single use, new generation supraglottic airway device which provides more rapid and higher volume gas passage through airway and can be inserted in a rapid and safe manner.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Erdal Komur, MD · Istanbul Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-31
Primary Completion
2015-06-30
Completion
2015-06-30

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02339519 on ClinicalTrials.gov