Tubeless Versus Standard Upper Pole Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

NCT02036398 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75

Last updated 2018-11-28

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparison of complications between standard upper pole percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with nephrostomy placement and double J stent and PCNL with double J placement only without nephrostomy.

Conditions

  • Pleural Effusion

Interventions

DEVICE

Double J stent without nephrostomy

Double J stent only left at the end of the procedure without placement of a nephrostomy tube

DEVICE

nephrostomy tube and double J stent

Double J stent and nephrostomy tube left at end of procedure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rabin Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Hanan Goldberg, MD · Rabin Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-01-31
Primary Completion
2017-04-07
Completion
2017-04-07

Countries

  • Israel

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02036398 on ClinicalTrials.gov