Asthma and Quantifying Delivery Of Radio Labeled Aerosol

NCT01823926 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 13

Last updated 2013-04-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Introduction: Inhalation therapy has been established as an efficient route to treat asthma exacerbations, but coupled to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) remains quite challenging.

Objectives: The aim of this study were to compare radiaoaerosol pulmonary index and radioaerosol mass balance in the different compartments (pulmonary and extrapulmonary) using vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) and jet nebulizer (JN) coupled to noninvasive ventilation (NIV).

Material and methods: The investigators assessed 10 stable moderate to severe asthmatics in a crossover study. Patients was randomly assigned to participate in both phases of the study: Phase 1(NIV+MN) and phase 2(NIV+JN). DTPA-Tc99m with radioactivity of 25 miC was used to inhaler using JN positioned in the circuit using a "T" piece, particle size generation in a five micron range and oxygen flow tritated at eight L/min and MN was positioned in the mask, particle size generation in a one range and connected to electrical energy. NIV was used a bilevel pressure through a face mask attached with straps and pressure adjusted were 12 cmH2O and 5 cmH2O as inspiratory and expiratory pressures, respectively. After, radioactivity counts were performed using a gama camera and regions of interest were delimited. To calculate aerosol mass balance the investigators considered the amount of radioaerosol deposited into the lungs, upper airways, stomach, nebulizer, circuit, inspiratory and expiratory filters, and mask divided for each of these compartments and represented as a percentage.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Noninvasive ventilation

Bilevel positive pressure (BiPAP Synchrony, Respironics®, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, USA) was applied through face mask (Comfort Full 2, Respironics®, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, USA) attached with straps and pressure adjusted were 12 cmH2O of inspiratory pressure and 5 cmH2O of expiratory pressure at the beginning of the procedure (França et al., 2006).

DEVICE

Jet nebulizer

Both nebulizers were charged with 2.5 mg of salbutamol and 0.25 mg of ipratropium bromide and 3 mL of saline solution was added to complete 3 Ml. JN (Mist yMax, Air Life, Yorba Linda, USA) was positioned in the circuit using a "T" piece, particle size generation in a 5 µm range (according to the manufacturer information) and flow oxygen tritated at 8 L/min.

DEVICE

The vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN)

Both nebulizers were charged with 2.5 mg of salbutamol and 0.25 mg of ipratropium bromide and 3 mL of saline solution was added to complete 3 Ml. VMN (Aeroneb Solo, Galway, Ireland) was positioned in the mask using an elbow (Elbow Kit, Respironics®, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, USA), particle size generation in a 1 µm and connected to electrical energy.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Valdecir G Filho · Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-10-31
Primary Completion
2011-10-31
Completion
2012-08-31

Countries

  • Brazil

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01823926 on ClinicalTrials.gov