MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Airway Intubation Devices When Using a Biohazard Suit

NCT01924559 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 37

Last updated 2017-05-09

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

We will investigate the impact biohazard gear has on time to successful intubation and, in particular, determine how the Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (Ecolab, Columbus, Missouri) device compares to traditional direct laryngoscopy and fiber-optic (video) intubation techniques.

Conditions

  • Intubation; Difficult

Interventions

OTHER

standard clothing

OTHER

Biohazard gear

DEVICE

Direct Laryngoscopy

DEVICE

Glidescope

DEVICE

Supraglottic Airway

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Lehigh Valley Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Scott Lipkin, DPM, CIP · Director, Research Participant Protection Office

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
126 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-08-31
Primary Completion
2013-09-30
Completion
2013-09-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01924559 on ClinicalTrials.gov