Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Third Trimester Induction of Labor
NCT01519765 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 73
Last updated 2016-09-27
Summary
Approximately 22% of term pregnancies are induced. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin E1 analogue, is a widely accepted induction agent, that has been proven safe and effective for induction of labor. It stimulates both cervical ripening and uterine contractions, thus making it an ideal induction agent for unfavorable cervices. Research has examined the pharmacokinetics of different administration routes and effects on uterine contractility, side effects, and safety. Vaginal misoprostol has been shown to be superior over oral administration however patients often prefer a more tolerable route. Buccal administration has already been shown to be as effective as vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction in both first trimester and second trimester abortions. There is minimal research comparing buccal versus vaginal for third trimester induction of labor. The investigators study is a prospective, double blinded, randomized control trial comparing vaginal misoprostol and buccal misoprostol in equal dosages of 25 mcg. The investigators seek to answer the question whether buccal misoprostol is as effective as vaginal misoprostol for third trimester induction of labor.
Conditions
- Pregnancy
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Buccal Misoprostol
Buccal rather than Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
- DRUG
-
Vaginal misoprostol
Vaginal rather than buccal misoprostol for induction of labor
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of California, Los Angeles
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Ram Parvataneni, MD · Associate Clinical Professor
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2014-12-31
- Completion
- 2014-12-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Oral Titrated Misoprostol for Induction of Labour
NCT00992524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Titrated Oral Misoprostol Compared to Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor
NCT02036437 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Randomized Trial of Two Regimens of Misoprostol for Second Trimester Termination for Intrauterine Fetal Death
NCT00141895 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT01428037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Misoprostol Labour Induction Study
NCT03489928 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Buccal Versus Vaginal Misoprostol In Combination With Foley Bulb
NCT03976037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Induction of Labour
NCT00346840 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Efficacy and Safety of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution for Labor Induction at Term
NCT01070472 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Low-dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor
NCT03744364 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sublingual Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
NCT01406392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison Between Vaginal and Sublingual Misoprostol 50 µg for Cervical Ripening Prior to Induction of Labor
NCT02732522 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol
NCT04755218 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Is More Than One Dose of Misoprostol Needed to Expedite Vaginal Delivery in a Patient With an Unripe Cervix?
NCT02680314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Obstetric Cook Double Balloon Catheter in Combination With Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
NCT01866488 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Trial of Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction Using Misoprostol With or Without Intravaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate
NCT00374621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between 25 µg Vaginal Misoprostol vs Slow Release Pessary PGE2
NCT01765881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Oral Misoprostol Solution in Comparison to Vaginal Misoprostol in Induction of Labor
NCT03863392 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Misoprostol 25 μg vs. Vaginal Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor at Term
NCT04955847 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
To Study the Efficacy and Safety of Misoprostol by Sublingual Routes for Induction of Labour
NCT04887493 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Misoprostol for Cervical Priming Prior to Vacuum Aspiration
NCT01933360 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison Between Vaginal Misoprostol Gel and Oral Misoprostol Solution in Induction of Labor
NCT06874049 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT02168881 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
24-hour Mifepristone and Buccal Versus Mifepristone and Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Preparation for D&E
NCT03134183 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Trial of Oral Misoprostol for Labor Augmentation
NCT00906347 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Vaginal Misodel® in Comparison With Orally Administrated Misoprostol (Cytotec®) at Induction of Labour
NCT02918110 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4