MedTrace Logo

Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

NCT02168881 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 342

Last updated 2014-06-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study is to compare between oral misoprostol in solution and vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labour in primiparous women with singleton pregnancy as regards efficiency and safety to both mother and fetus.

Conditions

  • Labour Induction

Interventions

DRUG

Misoprostol

DRUG

Dinoprostone

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ain Shams University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-05-31
Primary Completion
2016-01-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Drugs

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02168881 on ClinicalTrials.gov