Sublingual Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term
NCT00140114 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 170
Last updated 2012-07-13
Summary
Misoprostol (Cytotec®) is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analog that has been marketed in the United States since 1988 as a gastric cytoprotective agent. In contradistinction to prostaglandin E2 preparations (dinoprostone, Prepidil, Cervidil), misoprostol is inexpensive and available in scored tablets that can be broken and inserted vaginally. Despite a focused campaign by the manufacturer to curtail its use in obstetric practice, misoprostol has, over the past several years, gained widespread acceptance as both a labor induction and a cervical ripening agent. Such off-label indication has been endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other medical bodies. Recently, FDA approved a new label for the use of cytotec during pregnancy which removed pregnancy as a contraindication for its use. Vaginal administration seems to be more efficacious than when given orally, although there is the worry of uterine tachysystole and hyperstimulation with vaginal doses \> 50-µg. The use of sublingual misoprostol for cervical ripening at term was recently investigated in two studies that compared it to the oral route, on the assumption that the sublingual route would have the higher efficacy of the vaginal route by avoiding the first pass effects of the gastrointestinal and hepatic systems, while having lower hyperstimulation rates by avoiding the direct effects on the cervix. In addition, the sublingual route would combine an easier administration with the added advantage of no restriction of mobility after administration. There has been no previous report in the literature comparing the use of misoprostol given sublingually to that given vaginally for the induction of labor at term. Our aim is to compare efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction with misoprostol given vaginally (the current standard) to that given sublingually.
Conditions
- Induction of Labor
Interventions
- DRUG
-
Misoprostol (Cytotec®)
50 micrograms of sublingual or vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours for a maximum of 5 doses
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
American University of Beirut Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Anwar H Nassar, MD · American University of Beirut Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- SINGLE_GROUP
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2004-01-31
- Completion
- 2006-09-30
Countries
- Lebanon
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations
NCT02516631 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
TheEffect of pH on Misoprostol in Induction of Labor
NCT03829592 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Misoprostol Versus Dinoprostone in Induction of Labor
NCT06909721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Titrated Oral Misoprostol Compared to Vaginal Dinoprostone for Induction of Labor
NCT02036437 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Oral and Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Pregnant Women
NCT05696574 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Misoprostol Solution in Comparison to Vaginal Misoprostol in Induction of Labor
NCT03863392 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Is More Than One Dose of Misoprostol Needed to Expedite Vaginal Delivery in a Patient With an Unripe Cervix?
NCT02680314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Vaginal Misodel® in Comparison With Orally Administrated Misoprostol (Cytotec®) at Induction of Labour
NCT02918110 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Sub Lingual Misoprostol Before IUD Insertion in Women With Only Previous Cesarean Section
NCT02141321 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Induction With Misoprostol: Oral Mucosa Versus Vaginal Epithelium (IMPROVE)
NCT02408315 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT02168881 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Misoprostol in Reducing Post Partum Hemorrhage After Labor Induction by Oxytocin
NCT02983591 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sublingual Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
NCT01406392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of Oral Misoprostol and Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT02777190 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
To Study the Efficacy and Safety of Misoprostol by Sublingual Routes for Induction of Labour
NCT04887493 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Orally Administered Misoprostol in Diabetics
NCT00514618 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Efficacy Study of Vaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
NCT01428037 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Vaginally Administered Versus Per Oral Misoprostol in Induction of Labour
NCT02539199 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy and Safety of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution for Labor Induction at Term
NCT01070472 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Misoprostol for Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) in Home Births
NCT01508429 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Oral Misoprostol for Cervical Priming Before Hysteroscopy
NCT02159911 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Labour Induction
NCT03016208 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Labor Induction With Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol
NCT04755218 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Hysteroscopy and Misoprostol Project
NCT00363389 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Oral Versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction at Term
NCT05957666 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3