BIPAP Vision Versus OPTIFLOW System Comparison in Acute Respiratory Failure After Cardio Thoracic Surgery

NCT01458444 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 830

Last updated 2015-09-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The OPTIFLOW ™ use is becoming more common in acute respiratory failure cases, but its place in relation to VNI (Bi-PAP mode) is not yet defined. OPTIFLOW ™ vs the VNI comparison of the use, in the immediate postoperative period, should lead to define the role of each technique and lead to a optimal rationalization of patients management with acute respiratory failure after surgery.

Conditions

  • Respiratory Insufficiency

Interventions

DEVICE

Non invasive ventilation (VNI)

BIPAP® vision

DEVICE

Non invasive ventilation

OPTIFLOW system

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hôpital NOVO

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hopital Jean Minjoz

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Bordeaux

    collaborator OTHER
  • University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

    collaborator OTHER
  • Hopital Louis Pradel

    collaborator OTHER
  • Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • François STEPHAN, MD · CCML

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-05-31
Primary Completion
2014-01-31
Completion
2014-01-31

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01458444 on ClinicalTrials.gov