Autotitrating Versus Standard Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Newly Diagnosed Patients

NCT00901485 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 23

Last updated 2021-06-18

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy and tolerance of autotitrating non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard NIV in patients with newly diagnosed nocturnal hypoventilation who have never experienced nocturnal, home NIV.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

AutoVPAP

Automatically titrated non-invasive ventilator, with target gross alveolar ventilation and back up respiratory rate determined by learn function. Nocturnal use for one month in patient's home.

DEVICE

VPAPIIIST-A

Standard non-invasive ventilator with pressure and respiratory rate settings determined by healthcare professional. Nocturnal use for one month in the patient's home.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

    collaborator OTHER
  • ResMed

    lead INDUSTRY

Principal Investigators

  • Anita Simonds, MD, FRCP · Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospital NHS Trust

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-04-30
Primary Completion
2011-03-31
Completion
2011-03-31

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00901485 on ClinicalTrials.gov