MedTrace Logo

Monocanalicular Versus Bicanalicular Intubation in the Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

NCT01233596 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE3 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2015-03-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the study was to compare the success rate of monocanalicular intubation versus bicanalicular silicone intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children aged between 10 and 36 months.

Conditions

  • Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Interventions

DEVICE

Canalicular intubation

Intubation through the inferior canaliculus performed under general anaeshesia. The tubes were removed 3-4 months after the tube placement.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital Ostrava

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Pavel Kominek, MD,PhD,MBA · University Hospital Ostrava

Study Design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
10 Months
Max Age
36 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2006-01-31
Primary Completion
2009-06-30
Completion
2009-12-31

Countries

  • Czechia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01233596 on ClinicalTrials.gov