MedTrace Logo

Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation

NCT05902013 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 180

Last updated 2025-09-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to perform a pilot study investigating the first attempt intubation success rate differing between video laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation and direct laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation.

The study population will consist of 60 neonates and infants with congenital heart disease less than 1 year of age who need nasotracheal intubation during general anesthesia for cardiac procedures.

Standard nasotracheal intubation will be performed using either a video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy. Neonates and infants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to standard video laryngoscopy (with one of the following systems: Storz C-MAC Miller Video Laryngoscope, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany or Mc Grath Video Laryngoscope, Medtronic, Boulder,USA) or to direct laryngoscopy with one of the following blades: Miller or Macintosh (Heine, Hersching, Germany).

Conditions

  • Congenital Heart Disease
  • Airway Complication of Anesthesia

Interventions

DEVICE

laryngoscopy

laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of Vienna

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Eva M Base, MD · Medical University of Vienna

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Max Age
1 Year
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-09-21
Primary Completion
2025-12-31
Completion
2025-12-31

Countries

  • Austria

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05902013 on ClinicalTrials.gov