MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of Two Different Surgical Techniques in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty

NCT00913679 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 49

Last updated 2022-12-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare two different surgical techniques in hip resurfacing arthroplasty (RHA), comparing bloodflow and metabolism in the femoral head, as well as implant migration, periprosthetic bone mineral density, gait function and patient recovery.

Conditions

  • Osteonecrosis
  • Femoral Neck Fracture
  • Implant Failure

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Surgical approach (ReCap Hip Resurfacing System)

two different surgical approaches in hip resurfacing arthroplasty

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aarhus University Hospital

    collaborator OTHER

  • Zimmer Biomet

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • University of Aarhus

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
30 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-11-01
Primary Completion
2017-02-20
Completion
2020-11-30

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00913679 on ClinicalTrials.gov