MedTrace Logo

A Comparison of Two Total Hip Replacements: Hip Resurfacing System Versus Mallory-Head/Exeter

NCT00116948 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2014-12-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two total hip replacement systems: Hip Resurfacing System (ReCap) versus Mallory-Head/Exeter.

Conditions

  • Osteoarthrosis

Interventions

DEVICE

ReCap, Hip resurfacing system, Biomet

ReCap total hip arthroplasty inserted according to manufactures manual.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Biomet Merck Aps,Horsens, Denmark

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Gigtforeningen

    collaborator OTHER

  • Sahva A/S, Borgervænget 5-7, København Ø, Denmark

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Danske Fysioterapeuter

    collaborator OTHER

  • Regionshospitalet Silkeborg

    collaborator OTHER

  • Finnish Institute of Occupational Health

    collaborator OTHER

  • Regionshospitalet Hammel Neurocenter

    collaborator OTHER

  • University of Aarhus

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kjeld Søballe, MD., Prof. · Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
65 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2005-01-31
Primary Completion
2011-09-30
Completion
2012-01-31

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00116948 on ClinicalTrials.gov